Literature DB >> 27521841

Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac1, Bryan E Pfingst2.   

Abstract

Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measures of peak amplitude, and amplitude-growth function (AGF) slope have been shown to reflect characteristics of cochlear health (primarily spiral ganglion density) in anesthetized cochlear-implanted guinea pigs. Likewise, the effect of increasing the interphase gap (IPG) in each of these measures also reflects SGN density in the implanted guinea pig. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that suprathreshold ECAP measures, and also how they change as the IPG is increased, have the potential to be clinically applicable in human subjects. However, further work is first needed in order to determine the characteristics of these measures in humans who use cochlear implants. The current study examined across-site patterns of suprathreshold ECAP measures in 10 bilaterally-implanted, adult cochlear implant users. Results showed that both peak amplitude and slope of the AGF varied significantly from electrode to electrode in ear-specific patterns across the subjects' electrode arrays. As expected, increasing the IPG on average increased the peak amplitude and slope. Across ears, there was a significant, negative correlation between the slope of the ECAP AGF and the duration of hearing loss. Across-site patterns of ECAP peak amplitude and AGF slopes were also compared with common ground impedance values and significant correlations were observed in some cases, depending on the subject and condition. The results of this study, coupled with previous studies in animals, suggest that it is feasible to measure the change in suprathreshold ECAP measures as the IPG increases on most electrodes. Further work is needed to investigate the relationship between these measures and cochlear implant outcomes, and determine how these measures might be used when programming a cochlear-implant processor. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Electrode-neural interface

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27521841      PMCID: PMC5131540          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Michelle L Hughes; Carolyn J Brown; Charles A Miller; Heather South
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.

Authors:  D Cafarelli Dees; N Dillier; W K Lai; E von Wallenberg; B van Dijk; F Akdas; M Aksit; C Batman; A Beynon; S Burdo; J-M Chanal; L Collet; M Conway; C Coudert; L Craddock; H Cullington; N Deggouj; B Fraysse; S Grabel; J Kiefer; J G Kiss; T Lenarz; A Mair; S Maune; J Müller-Deile; J-P Piron; S Razza; C Tasche; H Thai-Van; F Toth; E Truy; A Uziel; G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; John M Deeks; Christopher J Long; Johannes Lyzenga; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

6.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

7.  Histopathology of cochlear implants in humans.

Authors:  J B Nadol; J Y Shiao; B J Burgess; D R Ketten; D K Eddington; B J Gantz; I Kos; P Montandon; N J Coker; J T Roland; J K Shallop
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Smith; F B Simmons
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings.

Authors:  P H Stypulkowski; C van den Honert
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  28 in total

1.  What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sangsook Choi; Erin Glickman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.

Authors:  Donald L Swiderski; Deborah J Colesa; Aaron P Hughes; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Timothy A Holden; Teresa A Zwolan; H Alexander Arts; Jill B Firszt; Christopher J Buswinka; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-27

5.  The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Changes over time in the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap (IPG) effect following cochlear implantation in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Heval Benav; Sjaak F L Klis; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

8.  Assessing the Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Recognition Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Tyler C McFayden; Haibo Wang; Katherine E Gill; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; Jianfen Luo; Ruijie Wang; Nancy He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.