Literature DB >> 11347637

The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants.

J H Frijns1, J J Briaire, J J Grote.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The fact that the anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea, especially, is essentially different from that of other species is likely to influence the outcome of cochlear implantation.
BACKGROUND: Multichannel cochlear implants give better speech understanding than single-channel devices. They are intended to make use of the tonotopic organization of the cochlea by selectively stimulating subpopulations of the auditory nerve. At higher stimulus levels and with monopolar stimulation, excitation of nerve fibers from other turns may interfere with this concept, especially with modiolus-hugging electrodes.
METHODS: A three-dimensional spiraling computer model of the human cochlea, based on histologic data, was used to test the spatial selectivity and the dynamic range before cross-turn stimulation takes place for the Clarion HiFocus implant with and without a positioner. The results were compared with a similar model of the guinea pig cochlea.
RESULTS: In humans (in contrast to the guinea pig), a well-designed modiolus-hugging electrode yielded reduced current thresholds and high spatial selectivity without reduction of the useful dynamic range. The apical turn of the human cochlea, however, is largely comparable in this respect with the guinea pig cochlea, where cross-turn stimulation reduces the dynamic range substantially.
CONCLUSION: The clinical success of cochlear implantation in humans and the favorable results with modiolus-hugging devices depend on the anatomy of the human cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11347637     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200105000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  38 in total

1.  [Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible?].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; A Aschendorff; I Arapakis; G J Ridder; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Intra-Operative Neural Response Telemetry and Acoustic Reflex Assessment using an Advance-In-Stylet Technique and Modiolus-Hugging: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-08-15

3.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Evaluation of a high-resolution patient-specific model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  Ahmet Cakir; Robert T Dwyer; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

6.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

9.  Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Ning Hu; Fawen Zhang; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-17

10.  An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants with integrated force sensing capability.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Kobler; Daniel Beckmann; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.