PURPOSE: Quantification of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) studies is hampered by inaccurate MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC). To date, most studies on MR-AC have been performed using PET/MR systems without time of flight (TOF). Maximum likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity (MLAA), however, has the potential to improve MR-AC by exploiting TOF. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of MR-AC on PET image quantification for TOF-PET/MR systems and to evaluate PET accuracy when using TOF in combination with MLAA (TOF-MLAA). PROCEDURES: Simulations were designed to evaluate (1) the impact of MR-AC on PET quantification for different TOF windows (667, 500, 333 and 167 ps) and (2) use of TOF-MLAA for improving PET quantification. TOF-ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) and TOF-MLAA reconstructions using MR-AC were compared with those obtained using TOF-OSEM with computed tomography-based AC (CT-AC). RESULTS: OSEM reconstructions without TOF showed a negative MR-AC-induced bias of -50 % in the bone. TOF-OSEM was able to reduce this bias down to -15 %, with more accurate results for better TOF. TOF-MLAA was able to reduce the bias to within 5 % but at the cost of a ∼40 % increase in image variance. CONCLUSIONS: TOF-MLAA can improve quantitative PET accuracy of PET/MR studies. Further improvements are anticipated with improving TOF performance.
PURPOSE: Quantification of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) studies is hampered by inaccurate MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC). To date, most studies on MR-AC have been performed using PET/MR systems without time of flight (TOF). Maximum likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity (MLAA), however, has the potential to improve MR-AC by exploiting TOF. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of MR-AC on PET image quantification for TOF-PET/MR systems and to evaluate PET accuracy when using TOF in combination with MLAA (TOF-MLAA). PROCEDURES: Simulations were designed to evaluate (1) the impact of MR-AC on PET quantification for different TOF windows (667, 500, 333 and 167 ps) and (2) use of TOF-MLAA for improving PET quantification. TOF-ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) and TOF-MLAA reconstructions using MR-AC were compared with those obtained using TOF-OSEM with computed tomography-based AC (CT-AC). RESULTS:OSEM reconstructions without TOF showed a negative MR-AC-induced bias of -50 % in the bone. TOF-OSEM was able to reduce this bias down to -15 %, with more accurate results for better TOF. TOF-MLAA was able to reduce the bias to within 5 % but at the cost of a ∼40 % increase in image variance. CONCLUSIONS: TOF-MLAA can improve quantitative PET accuracy of PET/MR studies. Further improvements are anticipated with improving TOF performance.
Authors: André Salomon; Andreas Goedicke; Bernd Schweizer; Til Aach; Volkmar Schulz Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ciprian Catana; Andre van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Christian J Michel; Michael Hamm; Matthias Fenchel; Bruce Fischl; Bruce Rosen; Matthias Schmand; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Gaspar Delso; Sebastian Fürst; Björn Jakoby; Ralf Ladebeck; Carl Ganter; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangtae Ahn; Florian Wiesinger; M Mehdi Khalighi; Craig S Levin; Andrei H Iagaru; Greg Zaharchuk; Martin Huellner; Gaspar Delso Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Gaspar Delso; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Thomas Beyer; Martin L Lassen; Ronald Boellaard; Gaspar Delso; Maqsood Yaqub; Bernhard Sattler; Harald H Quick Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 2.310