Literature DB >> 24384370

Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice.

Anthony Sclafani1, Philippe Marambaud2, Karen Ackroff3.   

Abstract

The present study compared the ability of sweet ageusic T1r3 knockout (KO) and Calhm1 KO mice to acquire preferences for a sucrose-paired flavor as well as for unflavored sucrose. The KO and wildtype (WT) mice were given 24-h one-bottle access to 8% sucrose containing one flavor CS+, e.g., grape) and to water containing a different flavor (CS-, e.g., cherry) over 4 training days. In subsequent two-bottle tests with the flavors in water only, the T1r3 KO and Calhm1 KO mice, like WT mice, preferred the CS+ to the CS-. After training with flavored solutions, both KO groups also preferred unflavored 8% sucrose to water although Calhm1 KO mice required more sugar experience to match the preference of the T1r3 KO mice. These findings demonstrate that Calhm1 KO mice, like T1r3 KO mice and WT mice, are sensitive to the post-oral preference conditioning actions of sucrose and can discriminate sugar from water. Yet, despite their acquired sucrose preferences, the Calhm1 KO and T1r3 KO mice consumed only half as much sugar per day as did WT mice. Thus, sweet taste signaling elements are not needed in the gut for sugar conditioning, but sweet taste signaling in the mouth is essential for the full expression of sugar appetite.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  24-h tests; Oral sugar conditioning; Post-oral sugar reward

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24384370      PMCID: PMC3944641          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  22 in total

1.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by oral monosodium glutamate in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  T1r3 taste receptor involvement in gustatory neural responses to ethanol and oral ethanol preference.

Authors:  Susan M Brasser; Meghan B Norman; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 5.  Dopamine and learned food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  Conditioned flavor preference learning by intragastric administration of L-glutamate in rats.

Authors:  Akira Uematsu; Tomokazu Tsurugizawa; Takashi Kondoh; Kunio Torii
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  CALHM1 ion channel mediates purinergic neurotransmission of sweet, bitter and umami tastes.

Authors:  Akiyuki Taruno; Valérie Vingtdeux; Makoto Ohmoto; Zhongming Ma; Gennady Dvoryanchikov; Ang Li; Leslie Adrien; Haitian Zhao; Sze Leung; Maria Abernethy; Jeremy Koppel; Peter Davies; Mortimer M Civan; Nirupa Chaudhari; Ichiro Matsumoto; Göran Hellekant; Michael G Tordoff; Philippe Marambaud; J Kevin Foskett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  24 in total

1.  TRPM4 and TRPM5 are both required for normal signaling in taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Debarghya Dutta Banik; Laura E Martin; Marc Freichel; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Kathryn F Medler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Novel epigenetic determinants of type 2 diabetes in Mexican-American families.

Authors:  Hemant Kulkarni; Mark Z Kos; Jennifer Neary; Thomas D Dyer; Jack W Kent; Harald H H Göring; Shelley A Cole; Anthony G Comuzzie; Laura Almasy; Michael C Mahaney; Joanne E Curran; John Blangero; Melanie A Carless
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  T1R2+T1R3-independent chemosensory inputs contributing to behavioral discrimination of sugars in mice.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Calhm2 governs astrocytic ATP releasing in the development of depression-like behaviors.

Authors:  J Ma; X Qi; C Yang; R Pan; S Wang; J Wu; L Huang; H Chen; J Cheng; R Wu; Y Liao; L Mao; F C Wang; Z Wu; J X An; Y Wang; X Zhang; C Zhang; Z Yuan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Sugar causes obesity and metabolic syndrome in mice independently of sweet taste.

Authors:  Ana Andres-Hernando; Masanari Kuwabara; David J Orlicky; Aurelie Vandenbeuch; Christina Cicerchi; Sue C Kinnamon; Thomas E Finger; Richard J Johnson; Miguel A Lanaspa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.310

7.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

8.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.