Literature DB >> 19158407

T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice.

Yada Treesukosol1, Ginger D Blonde, Alan C Spector.   

Abstract

The T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are expressed in taste receptor cells and form a heterodimer binding with compounds described as sweet by humans. We examined whether Polycose taste might be mediated through this heterodimer by testing T1R2 knockout (KO) and T1R3 KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls in a series of brief-access taste tests (25-min sessions with 5-s trials). Sucrose, Na-saccharin, and Polycose were each tested for three consecutive sessions with order of presentation varied among subgroups in a Latin-Square manner. Both KO groups displayed blunted licking responses and initiated significantly fewer trials of sucrose and Na-saccharin across a range of concentrations. KO mice tested after Polycose exposure demonstrated some degree of concentration-dependent licking of sucrose, likely attributable to learning related to prior postingestive experience. These results are consistent with prior findings in the literature, implicating the T1R2+3 heterodimer as the principal taste receptor for sweet-tasting ligands, and also provide support for the potential of postingestive experience to influence responding in the KO mice. In contrast, T1R2 KO and T1R3 KO mice displayed concentration-dependent licking responses to Polycose that tracked those of their WT controls and in some cases licked midrange concentrations more; the number of Polycose trials initiated overall did not differ between KO and WT mice. Thus, the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are individually unnecessary for normal concentration-dependent licking of Polycose to be expressed in a brief-access test. Whether at least one of these T1R protein subunits is necessary for normal Polycose responsiveness remains untested. Alternatively, there may be a novel taste receptor(s) that mediates polysaccharide taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158407      PMCID: PMC2698609          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.90869.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  52 in total

Review 1.  Receptors for bitter and sweet taste.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Montmayeur; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3.

Authors:  Sami Damak; Minqing Rong; Keiko Yasumatsu; Zaza Kokrashvili; Vijaya Varadarajan; Shiying Zou; Peihua Jiang; Yuzo Ninomiya; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-07

4.  Bitter taste of saccharin and acesulfame-K.

Authors:  John Horne; Harry T Lawless; Ward Speirs; Domenic Sposato
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Human receptors for sweet and umami taste.

Authors:  Xiaodong Li; Lena Staszewski; Hong Xu; Kyle Durick; Mark Zoller; Elliot Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Positional cloning of the mouse saccharin preference (Sac) locus.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; X Li; D R Reed; J D Ohmen; S Li; Z Chen; M G Tordoff; P J de Jong; C Wu; D B West; A Chatterjee; D A Ross; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Mammalian sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  G Nelson; M A Hoon; J Chandrashekar; Y Zhang; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  The sixth taste?

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste.

Authors:  Grace Q Zhao; Yifeng Zhang; Mark A Hoon; Jayaram Chandrashekar; Isolde Erlenbach; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A high-throughput screening procedure for identifying mice with aberrant taste and oromotor function.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Jodi Gresack; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  55 in total

1.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating KATP channels in taste cells.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Yonina G Frim; Ayelet Hochman; Gabrielle S Lubitz; Anthony J Basile; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  An application of Pavlovian principles to the problems of obesity and cognitive decline.

Authors:  T L Davidson; C H Sample; S E Swithers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  Artificial sweeteners stimulate adipogenesis and suppress lipolysis independently of sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  Becky R Simon; Sebastian D Parlee; Brian S Learman; Hiroyuki Mori; Erica L Scheller; William P Cawthorn; Xiaomin Ning; Katherine Gallagher; Björn Tyrberg; Fariba M Assadi-Porter; Charles R Evans; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  An analysis of licking microstructure in three strains of mice.

Authors:  A W Johnson; A Sherwood; D R Smith; M Wosiski-Kuhn; M Gallagher; P C Holland
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.