Catherine L Chen1,2,3, Theodore H Clay4, Stephen McLeod5, Han-Ying Peggy Chang6, Adrian W Gelb3, R Adams Dudley1,2,7. 1. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 2. Center for Healthcare Value, University of California, San Francisco. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco. 4. Clay Software and Statistics, Ashland, Oregon. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco. 6. Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 7. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
Importance: Routine preoperative medical testing is not recommended for patients undergoing low-risk surgery, but testing is common before surgery. A 30-day preoperative testing window is conventionally used for study purposes; however, the extent of routine testing that occurs prior to that point is unknown. Objective: To improve on existing cost estimates by identifying all routine preoperative testing that takes place after the decision is made to perform cataract surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study assessed preoperative care in a 50% sample of Medicare beneficiaries older than 66 years who underwent ambulatory cataract surgery in 2011. Data analysis was completed from March 2016 to October 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using ocular biometry as a procedure-specific indicator to mark the start of the routine preoperative testing window, we measured testing rates in the interval between ocular biometry and cataract surgery and compared this with testing rates in the 6 months preceding biometry. We estimated the total cost of testing that occurred between biometry and cataract surgery. Results: A total of 440 857 patients underwent cataract surgery. A total of 423 710 (96.1%) had an ocular biometry claim before index surgery, of whom 264 514 (60.0%) were female; the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 76.1 (6.2) years. A total of 111 998 (25.4%) underwent surgery more than 30 days after biometry. Among patients with a biometry claim, the mean number of tests/patient/month increased from 1.1 in the baseline period to 1.7 in the interval between biometry and cataract surgery. Although preoperative testing peaked in all patients in the 30 days preceding surgery (1.8 tests/patient/month), the subset of patients with no overlap between postbiometry and presurgery periods experienced increased testing rates to 1.8 tests per patient per month in the 30 days after biometry, regardless of the elapsed time between biometry and surgery. The total estimated cost of routine preoperative testing in the full cohort was $22.7 million; we estimate that routine preoperative testing costs Medicare up to $45.4 million annually. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of Medicare beneficiaries, routine preoperative medical testing occurs more often and is costlier than has been reported previously. Extra costs are attributable to testing that occurs prior to the 30-day window preceding surgery. As a cost-cutting measure, routine preoperative medical testing should be avoided in patients with cataracts throughout the interval between ocular biometry and cataract surgery.
Importance: Routine preoperative medical testing is not recommended for patients undergoing low-risk surgery, but testing is common before surgery. A 30-day preoperative testing window is conventionally used for study purposes; however, the extent of routine testing that occurs prior to that point is unknown. Objective: To improve on existing cost estimates by identifying all routine preoperative testing that takes place after the decision is made to perform cataract surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study assessed preoperative care in a 50% sample of Medicare beneficiaries older than 66 years who underwent ambulatory cataract surgery in 2011. Data analysis was completed from March 2016 to October 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using ocular biometry as a procedure-specific indicator to mark the start of the routine preoperative testing window, we measured testing rates in the interval between ocular biometry and cataract surgery and compared this with testing rates in the 6 months preceding biometry. We estimated the total cost of testing that occurred between biometry and cataract surgery. Results: A total of 440 857 patients underwent cataract surgery. A total of 423 710 (96.1%) had an ocular biometry claim before index surgery, of whom 264 514 (60.0%) were female; the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 76.1 (6.2) years. A total of 111 998 (25.4%) underwent surgery more than 30 days after biometry. Among patients with a biometry claim, the mean number of tests/patient/month increased from 1.1 in the baseline period to 1.7 in the interval between biometry and cataract surgery. Although preoperative testing peaked in all patients in the 30 days preceding surgery (1.8 tests/patient/month), the subset of patients with no overlap between postbiometry and presurgery periods experienced increased testing rates to 1.8 tests per patient per month in the 30 days after biometry, regardless of the elapsed time between biometry and surgery. The total estimated cost of routine preoperative testing in the full cohort was $22.7 million; we estimate that routine preoperative testing costs Medicare up to $45.4 million annually. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of Medicare beneficiaries, routine preoperative medical testing occurs more often and is costlier than has been reported previously. Extra costs are attributable to testing that occurs prior to the 30-day window preceding surgery. As a cost-cutting measure, routine preoperative medical testing should be avoided in patients with cataracts throughout the interval between ocular biometry and cataract surgery.
Authors: Jeffrey L Apfelbaum; Richard T Connis; David G Nickinovich; L Reuven Pasternak; James F Arens; Robert A Caplan; Richard T Connis; Lee A Fleisher; Richard Flowerdew; Barbara S Gold; James F Mayhew; David G Nickinovich; Linda Jo Rice; Michael F Roizen; Rebecca S Twersky Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Catherine L Chen; Grace A Lin; Naomi S Bardach; Theodore H Clay; W John Boscardin; Adrian W Gelb; Mervyn Maze; Michael A Gropper; R Adams Dudley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Kimberly M Brown; Yimei Han; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Alex H S Harris; Esther L Meerwijk; Robin N Kamal; Erika D Sears; Mary Hawn; Dan Eisenberg; Andrea K Finlay; Hildi Hagedorn; Seshadri Mudumbai Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Rolake O Alabi; Zachary A Turnbull; Peter G Coombs; Yiyuan Wu; Anton Orlin; Rv Paul Chan; Szilard Kiss; Donald J D'Amico; Mrinali P Gupta Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2019-09-04
Authors: Alast Ahmadi; Andrea Sorensen; Chad Wes A Villaflores; John N Mafi; Sitaram S Vangala; Ira S Hofer; John D Bartlett; Eric M Cheng; Victor F Duval; Cheryl Damberg; David Elashoff; Noah J Goldstein; Joseph A Ladapo; James M Moore; Antonio M Pessegueiro; Suzanne B Shu; Samuel A Skootsky; Ashley Turner; Catherine A Sarkisian Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Catherine L Chen; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Hui Shen; W John Boscardin; Han-Ying Peggy Chang; Mary A Whooley; Adrian W Gelb; Sei J Lee; R Adams Dudley Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Andrea Pike; Krista Mahoney; Andrea M Patey; Samantha Inwood; Sameh Mortazhejri; Rebecca Lawrence; Amanda Hall Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 2.692