Literature DB >> 24277690

Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.

Henk Zandvoort1, Tom Børsen, Michael Deneke, Stephanie J Bird.   

Abstract

Global society is facing formidable current and future problems that threaten the prospects for justice and peace, sustainability, and the well-being of humanity both now and in the future. Many of these problems are related to science and technology and to how they function in the world. If the social responsibility of scientists and engineers implies a duty to safeguard or promote a peaceful, just and sustainable world society, then science and engineering education should empower students to fulfil this responsibility. The contributions to this special issue present European examples of teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering, and provide examples and discussion of how this teaching can be promoted, and of obstacles that are encountered. Speaking generally, education aimed at preparing future scientists and engineers for social responsibility is presently very limited and seemingly insufficient in view of the enormous ethical and social problems that are associated with current science and technology. Although many social, political and professional organisations have expressed the need for the provision of teaching for social responsibility, important and persistent barriers stand in the way of its sustained development. What is needed are both bottom-up teaching initiatives from individuals or groups of academic teachers, and top-down support to secure appropriate embedding in the university. Often the latter is lacking or inadequate. Educational policies at the national or international level, such as the Bologna agreements in Europe, can be an opportunity for introducing teaching for social responsibility. However, frequently no or only limited positive effect of such policies can be discerned. Existing accreditation and evaluation mechanisms do not guarantee appropriate attention to teaching for social responsibility, because, in their current form, they provide no guarantee that the curricula pay sufficient attention to teaching goals that are desirable for society as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24277690     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9495-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  31 in total

1.  Ethics and engineering courses at Delft University of Technology: contents, educational setup and experiences.

Authors:  I R van de Poel; H Zandvoort; M Brumsen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Authors:  Erik Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Social responsibility in French engineering education: a historical and sociological analysis.

Authors:  Christelle Didier; Antoine Derouet
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach.

Authors:  Eddie Conlon; Henk Zandvoort
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.

Authors:  Joseph R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Some personal notes on role plays as an excellent teaching tool : commentary on "using and developing role plays in teaching aimed at preparing for social responsibility".

Authors:  Iris Hunger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  A case study of teaching social responsibility to doctoral students in the climate sciences.

Authors:  Tom Børsen; Avan N Antia; Mirjam Sophia Glessmer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Explicit training in human values and social attitudes of future engineers in Spain : commentary on "preparing to understand and use science in the real world: interdisciplinary study concentrations at the technical University of Darmstadt".

Authors:  Jaime Fabregat
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 9.  The teaching of ethics in the American undergraduate curriculum, 1876-1976.

Authors:  D Sloan
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  Using and developing role plays in teaching aimed at preparing for social responsibility.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn; J Otto Kroesen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  15 in total

1.  Strategies for Teaching Professional Ethics to IT Engineering Degree Students and Evaluating the Result.

Authors:  Rafael Miñano; Ángel Uruburu; Ana Moreno-Romero; Diego Pérez-López
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Preparing to understand and use science in the real world: interdisciplinary study concentrations at the Technical University of Darmstadt.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Liebert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corley; Youngjae Kim; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.

Authors:  Eun Ah Lee; Magdalena Grohman; Nicholas R Gans; Marco Tacca; Matthew J Brown
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Engineering Students' Views of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering.

Authors:  Jessica M Smith; Carrie J McClelland; Nicole M Smith
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Stakeholder Views of Nanosilver Linings: Macroethics Education and Automated Text Analysis Through Participatory Governance Role Play in a Workshop Format.

Authors:  Joshua Dempsey; Justin Stamets; Kathleen Eggleson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.

Authors:  William T Lynch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education.

Authors:  Hyemin Han
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Design and Development of a Course in Professionalism and Ethics for CDIO Curriculum in China.

Authors:  Yinghui Fan; Xingwei Zhang; Xinlu Xie
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics.

Authors:  Carl Mitcham; Elaine E Englehardt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.