Literature DB >> 28000093

Engineering Students' Views of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering.

Jessica M Smith1, Carrie J McClelland2, Nicole M Smith2.   

Abstract

The mining and energy industries present unique challenges to engineers, who must navigate sometimes competing responsibilities and codes of conduct, such as personal senses of right and wrong, professional ethics codes, and their employers' corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the current dominant framework used by industry to conceptualize firms' responsibilities to their stakeholders, yet has it plays a relatively minor role in engineering ethics education. In this article, we report on an interdisciplinary pedagogical intervention in a petroleum engineering seminar that sought to better prepare engineering undergraduate students to critically appraise the strengths and limitations of CSR as an approach to reconciling the interests of industry and communities. We find that as a result of the curricular interventions, engineering students were able to expand their knowledge of the social, rather than simply environmental and economic dimensions of CSR. They remained hesitant, however, in identifying the links between those social aspects of CSR and their actual engineering work. The study suggests that CSR may be a fruitful arena from which to illustrate the profoundly sociotechnical dimensions of the engineering challenges relevant to students' future careers.

Keywords:  Corporate social responsibility; Engineering ethics; Pedagogical strategies; Petroleum engineering; Student learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28000093     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9859-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Future directions in engineering ethics research: microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies.

Authors:  J R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.

Authors:  B Wynne
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2001-12

3.  Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.

Authors:  Henk Zandvoort; Tom Børsen; Michael Deneke; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.