Literature DB >> 25721444

Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.

Elizabeth A Corley1, Youngjae Kim2, Dietram A Scheufele3.   

Abstract

Scientists' sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists' social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading U.S. nanoscientists express a moderate level of social responsibility about their research. Yet, they have a strong sense of ethical obligation to protect laboratory workers (in both universities and industry) from unhealthy exposure to nanomaterials. We also find that there are significant differences in scientists' sense of social and ethical responsibility depending on their demographic characteristics, job affiliation, attention to media content, risk perceptions and benefit perceptions. We conclude with some implications for future research.

Keywords:  Nanotechnology; Research ethics; Scientist perceptions; Social responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721444     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  19 in total

1.  Scientific social responsibility: a call to arms.

Authors:  Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen; Peter Thostrup; Flemming Besenbacher
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Science and society. Testing time for climate science.

Authors:  Sheila Jasanoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Science, scientists, and policy advocacy.

Authors:  Robert T Lackey
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: results from an international survey.

Authors:  Joseph A Conti; Keith Killpack; Gina Gerritzen; Leia Huang; Maria Mircheva; Magali Delmas; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Richard P Appelbaum; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.

Authors:  John C Besley; Matthew Nisbet
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2011-08-30

6.  A case study of teaching social responsibility to doctoral students in the climate sciences.

Authors:  Tom Børsen; Avan N Antia; Mirjam Sophia Glessmer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Use of nanoparticles in Swiss Industry: a targeted survey.

Authors:  Kaspar Schmid; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.

Authors:  Craig A Poland; Rodger Duffin; Ian Kinloch; Andrew Maynard; William A H Wallace; Anthony Seaton; Vicki Stone; Simon Brown; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnology.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C L Geraci; V Murashov; E D Kuempel; R D Zumwalde; V Castranova; M D Hoover; L Hodson; K F Martinez
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.253

View more
  2 in total

1.  "Just Carbon": Ideas About Graphene Risks by Graphene Researchers and Innovation Advisors.

Authors:  Rickard Arvidsson; Max Boholm; Mikael Johansson; Monica Lindh de Montoya
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 0.917

2.  Gene Drives in the U.K., U.S., and Australian Press (2015-2019): How a New Focus on Responsibility Is Shaping Science Communication.

Authors:  Aleksandra Stelmach; Brigitte Nerlich; Sarah Hartley
Journal:  Sci Commun       Date:  2022-01-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.