Literature DB >> 22113233

Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Erik Fisher1.   

Abstract

Science policy mandates across the industrialized world insinuate more active roles for publics, their earlier participation in policy decisions, and expanded notions of science and technology governance. In response to these policies, engaged scholars in science studies have sought to design and conduct exercises aimed at better attuning science to its public contexts. As demand increases for innovative and potentially democratic forms of public engagement with science and technology, so also do the prospects for insights from science studies to contribute to policy agendas and institutional capabilities. This collection brings together an international set of scholars in science, technology and society who inquire into the meaning, efficacy and responsibility of engaged science studies scholarship as a public matter.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113233     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9331-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  29 in total

1.  Nanoethics and the breaching of boundaries: a heuristic for going from encouragement to a fuller integration of ethical, legal and social issues and science : commentary on: "Adding to the mix: integrating ELSI into a National Nanoscale Science and Technology Center".

Authors:  Julio R Tuma
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Participating despite questions: toward a more confident participatory technology assessment : commentary on: "Questioning 'participation': a critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a Flemish participatory technology assessment".

Authors:  David H Guston
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

Authors:  Richard Owen; Nicola Goldberg
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Nanoethics in a nanolab: ethics via participation.

Authors:  Julio R Tuma
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.

Authors:  Maja Horst
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  On identifying plausibility and deliberative public policy : commentary on: "Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology".

Authors:  René Von Schomberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy.

Authors:  Charles Thorpe
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2010-11-20

8.  The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on: "Constitutional moments in governing science and technology".

Authors:  Rinie van Est
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies.

Authors:  Haico te Kulve; Arie Rip
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  6 in total

1.  End of the Beginning and Public Health Pharmacogenomics: Knowledge in 'Mode 2' and P5 Medicine.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Erik Fisher; Edward S Dove; Hilary Burton; Galen E B Wright; Mario Masellis; Louise Warnich
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2012-01-01

2.  Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.

Authors:  Henk Zandvoort; Tom Børsen; Michael Deneke; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

Authors:  Steven M Flipse; Maarten C A van der Sanden; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Second-Guessing Scientists and Engineers: Post Hoc Criticism and the Reform of Practice in Green Chemistry and Engineering.

Authors:  William T Lynch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Delphi Technology Foresight Study: Mapping Social Construction of Scientific Evidence on Metagenomics Tests for Water Safety.

Authors:  Stanislav Birko; Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.