Literature DB >> 28005255

The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.

Eun Ah Lee1, Magdalena Grohman1, Nicholas R Gans2, Marco Tacca2, Matthew J Brown3.   

Abstract

Following previous work that shows engineering students possess different levels of understanding of ethics-implicit and explicit-this study focuses on how students' implicit understanding of engineering ethics influences their team discussion process, in cases where there is significant divergence between their explicit and implicit understanding. We observed student teams during group discussions of the ethical issues involved in their engineering design projects. Through the micro-scale discourse analysis based on cognitive ethnography, we found two possible ways in which implicit understanding influenced the discussion. In one case, implicit understanding played the role of intuitive ethics-an intuitive judgment followed by reasoning. In the other case, implicit understanding played the role of ethical insight, emotionally guiding the direction of the discussion. In either case, however, implicit understanding did not have a strong influence, and the conclusion of the discussion reflected students' explicit understanding. Because students' implicit understanding represented broader social implication of engineering design in both cases, we suggest to take account of students' relevant implicit understanding in engineering education, to help students become more socially responsible engineers.

Keywords:  Cognitive ethnography; Distributed cognition; Engineering ethics; Ethical insight; Implicit understanding; Intuitive ethics; Situated cognition; Situated learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005255     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9856-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Leigh E Nystrom; Andrew D Engell; John M Darley; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  How do morals change?

Authors:  Paul Bloom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The use of verbal protocols as data: an analysis of insight in the candle problem.

Authors:  Jessica I Fleck; Robert W Weisberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

5.  Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes.

Authors:  Robert J Rydell; Allen R McConnell; Diane M Mackie; Laura M Strain
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-11

Review 6.  The new synthesis in moral psychology.

Authors:  Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering.

Authors:  Henk Zandvoort; Tom Børsen; Michael Deneke; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  The good engineer: giving virtue its due in engineering ethics.

Authors:  Charles E Harris
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  People or systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer.

Authors:  Richard J Holden
Journal:  Prof Saf       Date:  2009-12

10.  The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems.

Authors:  M J Beeman; E M Bowden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  "In Our Own Little World": Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Lim; Brittany D Hunt; Nickcoy Findlater; Peter T Tkacik; Jerry L Dahlberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.