OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Minimally invasive image-guided approach to cochlear implantation (CI) involves drilling a narrow, linear tunnel to the cochlea. Reported herein is the first clinical implementation of this approach. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: On preoperative computed tomography (CT), a safe linear trajectory through the facial recess targeting the scala tympani was planned. Intraoperatively, fiducial markers were bone-implanted, a second CT was acquired, and the trajectory was transferred from preoperative to intraoperative CT. A customized microstereotactic frame was rapidly designed and constructed to constrain a surgical drill along the desired trajectory. Following sterilization, the frame was employed to drill the tunnel to the middle ear. After lifting a tympanomeatal flap and performing a cochleostomy, the electrode array was threaded through the drilled tunnel and into the cochlea. RESULTS: Eight of nine patients were successfully implanted using the proposed approach with six insertions completely within the scala tympani. Traditional mastoidectomy was performed on one patient following difficulty threading the electrode array via the narrow tunnel. Other difficulties encountered included use of the backup implant when an electrode was dislodged during threading via the tunnel, tip fold-over, and facial nerve paresis (House-Brackmann II/VI at 12 months) secondary to heat during drilling. The average time of intervention was 182 ± 36 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive image-guided CI is clinically achievable. Further clinical study is necessary to address technological difficulties during drilling and insertion, and to assess potential benefits including decreased time of intervention, standardization of surgical intervention, and decreased tissue dissection potentially leading to shorter recovery and earlier implant activation.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Minimally invasive image-guided approach to cochlear implantation (CI) involves drilling a narrow, linear tunnel to the cochlea. Reported herein is the first clinical implementation of this approach. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: On preoperative computed tomography (CT), a safe linear trajectory through the facial recess targeting the scala tympani was planned. Intraoperatively, fiducial markers were bone-implanted, a second CT was acquired, and the trajectory was transferred from preoperative to intraoperative CT. A customized microstereotactic frame was rapidly designed and constructed to constrain a surgical drill along the desired trajectory. Following sterilization, the frame was employed to drill the tunnel to the middle ear. After lifting a tympanomeatal flap and performing a cochleostomy, the electrode array was threaded through the drilled tunnel and into the cochlea. RESULTS: Eight of nine patients were successfully implanted using the proposed approach with six insertions completely within the scala tympani. Traditional mastoidectomy was performed on one patient following difficulty threading the electrode array via the narrow tunnel. Other difficulties encountered included use of the backup implant when an electrode was dislodged during threading via the tunnel, tip fold-over, and facial nerve paresis (House-Brackmann II/VI at 12 months) secondary to heat during drilling. The average time of intervention was 182 ± 36 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive image-guided CI is clinically achievable. Further clinical study is necessary to address technological difficulties during drilling and insertion, and to assess potential benefits including decreased time of intervention, standardization of surgical intervention, and decreased tissue dissection potentially leading to shorter recovery and earlier implant activation.
Authors: Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; Robert F Labadie; Benoit Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Theodore A Schuman; Jack H Noble; Charles G Wright; George B Wanna; Benoit Dawant; Robert F Labadie Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Maura K Cosetti; Scott H Troob; Jonathan M Latzman; William H Shapiro; John Thomas Roland; Susan B Waltzman Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Robert F Labadie; Jason Mitchell; Ramya Balachandran; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-02-28 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Sergej Wall; G Jakob Lexow; Carl Philipp Lang; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Igor Stenin; Stefan Hansen; M Nau-Hermes; W El-Hakimi; M Becker; J Bredemann; J Kristin; T Klenzner; J Schipper Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Neal P Dillon; Ramya Balachandran; Michael A Siebold; Robert J Webster; George B Wanna; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Michael Schoppe; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Daniel Schneider; Igor Stenin; Juan Ansó; Jan Hermann; Fabian Mueller; Gabriela Pereira Bom Braga; Christoph Rathgeb; Wilhelm Wimmer; Joerg Schipper; Julia Kristin; Marco Caversaccio; Lukas Anschuetz; Stefan Weber; Thomas Klenzner Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: William G Morrel; Asitha D L Jayawardena; Susan M Amberg; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 3.325