Literature DB >> 28197759

Minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the lateral skull base: a first in vitro evaluation.

Igor Stenin1, Stefan Hansen2, M Nau-Hermes3, W El-Hakimi4, M Becker4, J Bredemann3, J Kristin5, T Klenzner5, J Schipper5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to validate a minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the internal auditory canal at the lateral skull base on a cadaver specimen.
METHODS: Fiducials and a custom baseplate were fixed on a cadaver skull, and a computed tomography image was acquired. Three trajectories from the mastoid surface to the internal auditory canal were computed with a custom planning tool. A self-developed positioning system with a drill guide was attached to the baseplate. After referencing on a high precision coordinate measuring machine, the drill guide was aligned according to the planned trajectories. Drilling of three trajectories was performed with a medical stainless steel drill bit.
RESULTS: The process of planning and drilling three trajectories to the internal auditory canal with the presented workflow and tools was successful. The mean drilling error of the system (Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and centerline of the actual drilled canal) was [Formula: see text] mm at the entry point and [Formula: see text] mm at the target. The inaccuracy of the drill process itself and its physical limitations were identified as the main contributing factors.
CONCLUSION: The presented system allows the planning and drilling of multiple minimally invasive canals at the lateral skull base. Further studies are required to reduce the drilling error and evaluate the clinical application of the system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Minimally invasive; Otology; Skull base surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28197759     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1533-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  17 in total

1.  [Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible?].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; A Aschendorff; I Arapakis; G J Ridder; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Configuration optimization and experimental accuracy evaluation of a bone-attached, parallel robot for skull surgery.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Kobler; Kathrin Nuelle; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lueder A Kahrs; Jens Kotlarski; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Percutaneous cochlear implant drilling via customized frames: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Intracochlear visualization: comparing established and novel endoscopy techniques.

Authors:  Lueder Alexander Kahrs; Theodore R McRackan; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy?

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Bryan M Davis; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  A robot-guided minimally invasive approach for cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results of a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Temporal bone borehole accuracy for cochlear implantation influenced by drilling strategy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Kobler; Michael Schoppe; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access.

Authors:  Brett Bell; Nicolas Gerber; Tom Williamson; Kate Gavaghan; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Minimally invasive multiport surgery of the lateral skull base.

Authors:  Igor Stenin; Stefan Hansen; Meike Becker; Georgios Sakas; Dieter Fellner; Thomas Klenzner; Jörg Schipper
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic cochlear implantation: feasibility of a multiport approach in an ex vivo model.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Igor Stenin; Juan Ansó; Jan Hermann; Fabian Mueller; Gabriela Pereira Bom Braga; Christoph Rathgeb; Wilhelm Wimmer; Joerg Schipper; Julia Kristin; Marco Caversaccio; Lukas Anschuetz; Stefan Weber; Thomas Klenzner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Influence of patient-specific anatomy on medical computed tomography and risk evaluation of minimally invasive surgery at the otobasis.

Authors:  Vanessa Schieferbein; Judith Bredemann; R Schmitt; I Stenin; T Klenzner; Jörg Schipper; Julia Kristin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.