Igor Stenin1, Stefan Hansen2, M Nau-Hermes3, W El-Hakimi4, M Becker4, J Bredemann3, J Kristin5, T Klenzner5, J Schipper5. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. igor.stenin@med.uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. 4. Interactive Graphics Systems Group, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany. 5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to validate a minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the internal auditory canal at the lateral skull base on a cadaver specimen. METHODS: Fiducials and a custom baseplate were fixed on a cadaver skull, and a computed tomography image was acquired. Three trajectories from the mastoid surface to the internal auditory canal were computed with a custom planning tool. A self-developed positioning system with a drill guide was attached to the baseplate. After referencing on a high precision coordinate measuring machine, the drill guide was aligned according to the planned trajectories. Drilling of three trajectories was performed with a medical stainless steel drill bit. RESULTS: The process of planning and drilling three trajectories to the internal auditory canal with the presented workflow and tools was successful. The mean drilling error of the system (Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and centerline of the actual drilled canal) was [Formula: see text] mm at the entry point and [Formula: see text] mm at the target. The inaccuracy of the drill process itself and its physical limitations were identified as the main contributing factors. CONCLUSION: The presented system allows the planning and drilling of multiple minimally invasive canals at the lateral skull base. Further studies are required to reduce the drilling error and evaluate the clinical application of the system.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to validate a minimally invasive, multi-port approach to the internal auditory canal at the lateral skull base on a cadaver specimen. METHODS: Fiducials and a custom baseplate were fixed on a cadaver skull, and a computed tomography image was acquired. Three trajectories from the mastoid surface to the internal auditory canal were computed with a custom planning tool. A self-developed positioning system with a drill guide was attached to the baseplate. After referencing on a high precision coordinate measuring machine, the drill guide was aligned according to the planned trajectories. Drilling of three trajectories was performed with a medical stainless steel drill bit. RESULTS: The process of planning and drilling three trajectories to the internal auditory canal with the presented workflow and tools was successful. The mean drilling error of the system (Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and centerline of the actual drilled canal) was [Formula: see text] mm at the entry point and [Formula: see text] mm at the target. The inaccuracy of the drill process itself and its physical limitations were identified as the main contributing factors. CONCLUSION: The presented system allows the planning and drilling of multiple minimally invasive canals at the lateral skull base. Further studies are required to reduce the drilling error and evaluate the clinical application of the system.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computer-assisted surgery; Minimally invasive; Otology; Skull base surgery
Authors: Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Michael Schoppe; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Brett Bell; Nicolas Gerber; Tom Williamson; Kate Gavaghan; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Igor Stenin; Stefan Hansen; Meike Becker; Georgios Sakas; Dieter Fellner; Thomas Klenzner; Jörg Schipper Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Daniel Schneider; Igor Stenin; Juan Ansó; Jan Hermann; Fabian Mueller; Gabriela Pereira Bom Braga; Christoph Rathgeb; Wilhelm Wimmer; Joerg Schipper; Julia Kristin; Marco Caversaccio; Lukas Anschuetz; Stefan Weber; Thomas Klenzner Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 2.503