Jan-Philipp Kobler1, Sergej Wall2, G Jakob Lexow3, Carl Philipp Lang4, Omid Majdani4, Lüder A Kahrs2, Tobias Ortmaier2. 1. Institute of Mechatronic Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167, Hanover, Germany. jan-philipp.kobler@imes.uni-hannover.de. 2. Institute of Mechatronic Systems, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167, Hanover, Germany. 3. Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hanover, Germany. lexow.jakob@mh-hannover.de. 4. Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: During guided drilling for minimally invasive cochlear implantation and related applications, typically forces and torques act on the employed tool guides, which result from both the surgeon's interaction and the bone drilling process. Such loads propagate through the rigid mechanisms and result in deformations of compliant parts, which in turn affect the achievable accuracy. In this paper, the order of magnitude as well as the factors influencing such loads are studied experimentally to facilitate design and optimization of future drill guide prototypes. METHODS: The experimental setup to evaluate the occurring loads comprises two six degree of freedom force/torque sensors: one mounted between a manually operated, linearly guided drill handpiece and one below the specimens into which the drilling is carried out. This setup is used to analyze the influences of drilling tool geometry, spindle speed as well as experience of the operator on the resulting loads. RESULTS: The results reveal that using a spiral drill results in lower process loads compared with a surgical Lindemann mill. Moreover, in this study, an experienced surgeon applied lower interaction forces compared with untrained volunteers. The measured values further indicate that both the intraoperative handling of the bone-attached drill guide as well as the tool removal after completing the hole can be expected to cause temporary load peaks which exceed the values acquired during the drilling procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained using the proposed experimental setup serve as realistic design criteria with respect to the development of future drill guide prototypes. Furthermore, the given values can be used to parameterize simulations for profound stiffness analyses of existing mechanisms.
PURPOSE: During guided drilling for minimally invasive cochlear implantation and related applications, typically forces and torques act on the employed tool guides, which result from both the surgeon's interaction and the bone drilling process. Such loads propagate through the rigid mechanisms and result in deformations of compliant parts, which in turn affect the achievable accuracy. In this paper, the order of magnitude as well as the factors influencing such loads are studied experimentally to facilitate design and optimization of future drill guide prototypes. METHODS: The experimental setup to evaluate the occurring loads comprises two six degree of freedom force/torque sensors: one mounted between a manually operated, linearly guided drill handpiece and one below the specimens into which the drilling is carried out. This setup is used to analyze the influences of drilling tool geometry, spindle speed as well as experience of the operator on the resulting loads. RESULTS: The results reveal that using a spiral drill results in lower process loads compared with a surgical Lindemann mill. Moreover, in this study, an experienced surgeon applied lower interaction forces compared with untrained volunteers. The measured values further indicate that both the intraoperative handling of the bone-attached drill guide as well as the tool removal after completing the hole can be expected to cause temporary load peaks which exceed the values acquired during the drilling procedure itself. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained using the proposed experimental setup serve as realistic design criteria with respect to the development of future drill guide prototypes. Furthermore, the given values can be used to parameterize simulations for profound stiffness analyses of existing mechanisms.
Authors: Brett Bell; Christof Stieger; Nicolas Gerber; Andreas Arnold; Claude Nauer; Volkmar Hamacher; Martin Kompis; Lutz Nolte; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2012-03-04 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Grégoire Blachon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jan-Philipp Kobler; Michael Schoppe; G Jakob Lexow; Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Lüder A Kahrs; Tobias Ortmaier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jason E Mitchell; Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Tom M Williamson; Brett J Bell; Nicolas Gerber; Lilibeth Salas; Philippe Zysset; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 4.538