Literature DB >> 15376672

The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

John F Culling1, Monica L Hawley, Ruth Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the roles of interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences (ILDs) in spatial unmasking in multi-source environments. In experiment 1, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in virtual-acoustic simulations of an anechoic environment with three interfering sound sources of either speech or noise. The target source lay directly ahead, while three interfering sources were (1) all at the target's location (0 degrees,0 degrees,0 degrees), (2) at locations distributed across both hemifields (-30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees), (3) at locations in the same hemifield (30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees), or (4) co-located in one hemifield (90 degrees,90 degrees,90 degrees). Sounds were convolved with head-related impulse responses (HRIRs) that were manipulated to remove individual binaural cues. Three conditions used HRIRs with (1) both ILDs and ITDs, (2) only ILDs, and (3) only ITDs. The ITD-only condition produced the same pattern of results across spatial configurations as the combined cues, but with smaller differences between spatial configurations. The ILD-only condition yielded similar SRTs for the (-30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees) and (0 degrees,0 degrees,0 degrees) configurations, as expected for best-ear listening. In experiment 2, pure-tone BMLDs were measured at third-octave frequencies against the ITD-only, speech-shaped noise interferers of experiment 1. These BMLDs were 4-8 dB at low frequencies for all spatial configurations. In experiment 3, SRTs were measured for speech in diotic, speech-shaped noise. Noises were filtered to reduce the spectrum level at each frequency according to the BMLDs measured in experiment 2. SRTs were as low or lower than those of the corresponding ITD-only conditions from experiment 1. Thus, an explanation of speech understanding in complex listening environments based on the combination of best-ear listening and binaural unmasking (without involving sound-localization) cannot be excluded.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376672     DOI: 10.1121/1.1772396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  53 in total

1.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.

Authors:  Rui Wan; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

6.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

10.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.