Literature DB >> 12051442

Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited.

Ewan A Macpherson1, John C Middlebrooks.   

Abstract

The virtual auditory space technique was used to quantify the relative strengths of interaural time difference (ITD), interaural level difference (ILD), and spectral cues in determining the perceived lateral angle of wideband, low-pass, and high-pass noise bursts. Listeners reported the apparent locations of virtual targets that were presented over headphones and filtered with listeners' own directional transfer functions. The stimuli were manipulated by delaying or attenuating the signal to one ear (by up to 600 micros or 20 dB) or by altering the spectral cues at one or both ears. Listener weighting of the manipulated cues was determined by examining the resulting localization response biases. In accordance with the Duplex Theory defined for pure-tones, listeners gave high weight to ITD and low weight to ILD for low-pass stimuli, and high weight to ILD for high-pass stimuli. Most (but not all) listeners gave low weight to ITD for high-pass stimuli. This weight could be increased by amplitude-modulating the stimuli or reduced by lengthening stimulus onsets. For wideband stimuli, the ITD weight was greater than or equal to that given to ILD. Manipulations of monaural spectral cues and the interaural level spectrum had little influence on lateral angle judgements.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12051442     DOI: 10.1121/1.1471898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  136 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Effects of reverberation on the directional sensitivity of auditory neurons across the tonotopic axis: influences of interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Perceptual sensitivity to high-frequency interaural time differences created by rustling sounds.

Authors:  Stephan D Ewert; Katharina Kaiser; Lavinia Kernschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

5.  Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.

Authors:  Andrew Schwartz; Josh H McDermott; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.

Authors:  Pascal Michelet; Damir Kovacić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contributions of procedure and stimulus learning to early, rapid perceptual improvements.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.