Literature DB >> 12398467

Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.

Susan E Boehnke1, Susan E Hall, Torsten Marquardt.   

Abstract

This study examines the relation between a static and a dynamic measure of interaural correlation discrimination: (1) the just noticeable difference (JND) in interaural correlation and (2) the minimum detectable duration of a fixed interaural correlation change embedded within a single noise-burst of a given reference correlation. For the first task, JNDs were obtained from reference interaural correlations of + 1, -1, and from 0 interaural correlation in either the positive or negative direction. For the dynamic task, duration thresholds were obtained for a brief target noise of +1, -1, and 0 interaural correlation embedded in reference marker noise of +1, -1, and 0 interaural correlation. Performance with a reference interaural correlation of +1 was significantly better than with a reference correlation of -1. Similarly, when the reference noise was interaurally uncorrelated, discrimination was significantly better for a target correlation change towards +1 than towards -1. Thus, for both static and dynamic tasks, interaural correlation discrimination in the positive range was significantly better than in the negative range. Using the two measures, the length of a binaural temporal window was estimated. Its equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) was approximately 86 ms and independent of the interaural correlation configuration.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12398467     DOI: 10.1121/1.1504857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory midbrain and nerve responses to sinusoidal variations in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram van de Sande; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Decorrelation sensitivity of auditory nerve and anteroventral cochlear nucleus fibers to broadband and narrowband noise.

Authors:  Dries H G Louage; Philip X Joris; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Nandini Iyer; Charissa R Lansing; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-21

6.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-17

8.  Accurate sound localization in reverberant environments is mediated by robust encoding of spatial cues in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Antje Ihlefeld; Kenneth Hancock; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contributions of intrinsic neural and stimulus variance to binaural sensitivity.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.