Literature DB >> 24203781

Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Jan P Röer1, Raoul Bell, Axel Buchner.   

Abstract

Working memory theories make opposing predictions as to whether the disruptive effect of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall should be attenuated after repeated exposure to the auditory distractors. Although evidence of habituation has emerged after a passive listening phase, previous attempts to observe habituation to to-be ignored distractors on a trial-by-trial basis have proven to be fruitless. With the present study, we suggest that habituation to auditory distractors occurs, but has often been overlooked because past attempts to measure habituation in the irrelevant-sound paradigm were not sensitive enough. In a series of four experiments, the disruptive effects of to-be-ignored speech and music relative to a quiet control condition were markedly reduced after eight repetitions, regardless of whether trials were presented in blocks (Exp. 1) or in a random order (Exp. 2). The auditory distractor's playback direction (forward, backward) had no effect (Exp. 3). The same results were obtained when the auditory distractors were only presented in a retention interval after the presentation of the to-be-remembered items (Exp. 4). This pattern is only consistent with theoretical accounts that allow for attentional processes to interfere with the maintenance of information in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24203781     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

Review 1.  Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; E Schröger; I Winkler
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color-word interference task.

Authors:  E M Elliott; N Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set size effects.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; István Winkler; Teija Kujala; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-12

4.  Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?

Authors:  John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Modeling distributions of immediate memory effects: no strategies needed?

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Ian Neath; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-12-10

8.  Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.

Authors:  François Vachon; Robert W Hughes; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The Distracting Effects of a Ringing Cell Phone: An Investigation of the Laboratory and the Classroom Setting.

Authors:  Jill T Shelton; Emily M Elliott; Sharon D Lynn; Amanda L Exner
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2009-12

10.  Habituation of the orienting response: a gating mechanism subserving selective attention.

Authors:  W F Waters; D G McDonald; R L Koresko
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  14 in total

1.  Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Ulrike Körner; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.

Authors:  Catherine D Middlebrooks; Tyson Kerr; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  A preregistered replication and extension of the cocktail party phenomenon: One's name captures attention, unexpected words do not.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Irrelevant music: How suprasegmental changes of a melody's tempo and mode affect the disruptive potential of music on serial recall.

Authors:  Judith Schweppe; Jens Knigge
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08

8.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges.

Authors:  Sabine J Schlittmeier; Alexandra Feil; Andreas Liebl; J Rgen Hellbr Ck
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.