Literature DB >> 21895389

Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.

François Vachon1, Robert W Hughes, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

The role of memory in behavioral distraction by auditory attentional capture was investigated: We examined whether capture is a product of the novelty of the capturing event (i.e., the absence of a recent memory for the event) or its violation of learned expectancies on the basis of a memory for an event structure. Attentional capture-indicated by disruption of a focal visually presented serial recall task-was found when the voice conveying a concurrent irrelevant auditory sequence changed every 5 recall trials (from male to female or vice versa). There was no evidence of attentional capture when the irrelevant sequence was first encountered and hence novel; capture occurred only when an expectation for a particular voice had been learned and then violated. Furthermore, with the increasing predictability of (and hence expectancy for) the voice changes across the experimental session, the capture response diminished only to be reinstated when that session-wide expectation was itself violated by a break in the change-every-5-trials pattern. The results highlight the critical role of learned expectations, as opposed to novelty detection, in behavioral auditory attentional capture.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895389     DOI: 10.1037/a0025054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Unexpected events induce motor slowing via a brain mechanism for action-stopping with global suppressive effects.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

3.  Monitoring prediction errors facilitates cognition in action.

Authors:  John Plass; Simon Choi; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-12

4.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Baseline psychophysiological and cortisol reactivity as a predictor of PTSD treatment outcome in virtual reality exposure therapy.

Authors:  Seth Davin Norrholm; Tanja Jovanovic; Maryrose Gerardi; Kathryn G Breazeale; Matthew Price; Michael Davis; Erica Duncan; Kerry J Ressler; Bekh Bradley; Albert Rizzo; Peter W Tuerk; Barbara O Rothbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-05-07

6.  False external feedback modulates posterror slowing and the f-P300: implications for theories of posterror adjustment.

Authors:  Blair Saunders; Ines Jentzsch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Jan R Wessel; Ayda Ghahremani; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events.

Authors:  Anatole Nöstl; John E Marsh; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

10.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.