Literature DB >> 14659495

The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set size effects.

Tom Campbell1, István Winkler, Teija Kujala, Risto Näätänen.   

Abstract

This study investigated how increases in the number of different types of sound (token set size) within a heard but ignored sequence influence brain activity and performance in a serial recall task (the irrelevant sound effect). We tested the hypothesis that brain processes affected by the refractory state of the neuronal populations involved in generating the auditory N1 play a role in the memory disruption produced by irrelevant sound. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded when volunteers performed a serial recall task that required remembering lists of visually presented numbers that were followed by a distractor-filled retention interval. The results showed that both increments in set size from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 5 elicited an increase of the N1 amplitude. Furthermore, increases in set size from 2 to 5, but not from 1 to 2, caused a significant decrease of the serial recall performance. This result suggested that, if N1 were to play a role in the disruption produced by irrelevant sound, the processes underlying the N1 wave may only serve as a necessary rather than a sufficient condition for disruption.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659495     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  9 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

5.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

6.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Doubts About the Role of Rehearsal in the Irrelevant Sound Effect.

Authors:  Jamielyn R Samper; Alexandra Morrison; Jason Chein
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15

9.  The ups and downs of temporal orienting: a review of auditory temporal orienting studies and a model associating the heterogeneous findings on the auditory N1 with opposite effects of attention and prediction.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.