Literature DB >> 19081558

Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.

John E Marsh1, Robert W Hughes, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

Distraction by irrelevant background sound of visually-based cognitive tasks illustrates the vulnerability of attentional selectivity across modalities. Four experiments centred on auditory distraction during tests of memory for visually-presented semantic information. Meaningful irrelevant speech disrupted the free recall of semantic category-exemplars more than meaningless irrelevant sound (Experiment 1). This effect was exacerbated when the irrelevant speech was semantically related to the to-be-remembered material (Experiment 2). Importantly, however, these effects of meaningfulness and semantic relatedness were shown to arise only when instructions emphasized recall by category rather than by serial order (Experiments 3 and 4). The results favor a process-oriented, rather than a structural, approach to the breakdown of attentional selectivity and forgetting: performance is impaired by the similarity of process brought to bear on the relevant and irrelevant material, not the similarity in item content.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081558     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  25 in total

1.  The impact of auditory distraction on retrieval of visual memories.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Rethinking hyperactivity in pediatric ADHD: Preliminary evidence for a reconceptualization of hyperactivity/impulsivity from the perspective of informant perceptual processes.

Authors:  Michael J Kofler; Nicole B Groves; Leah J Singh; Elia F Soto; Elizabeth S M Chan; Lauren N Irwin; Caroline E Miller
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  The Role of Visual Stimuli in Cross-Modal Stroop Interference.

Authors:  Danielle A Lutfi-Proctor; Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Ulrike Körner; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Flexible attention allocation to visual and auditory working memory tasks: manipulating reward induces a trade-off.

Authors:  Candice Coker Morey; Nelson Cowan; Richard D Morey; Jeffery N Rouder
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Candice Mills; James Bartlett; Nancy Tye-Murray; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Maciej Hanczakowski; Helen M Hodgetts; John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

9.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

10.  Mental imagery for musical changes in loudness.

Authors:  Freya Bailes; Laura Bishop; Catherine J Stevens; Roger T Dean
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.