Literature DB >> 20871175

Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?

John E Marsh1, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

Mental tasks are susceptible to disruption by concurrent to-be-ignored speech. The goal of the present paper is to examine whether a theoretical framework successfully applied to irrelevant speech effects in serial recall-interference by process-can be extended to verbal tasks in which meaning is the basis of retrieval and to which the irrelevant sound is related to different degrees by meaning. That the semantic characteristics of the to-be-ignored sound interact with the predominance of semantic retrieval in the focal task to determine the degree of disruption is demonstrated in three settings: free recall, category-clustering and fluency. Source monitoring-the difficulty in discriminating episodic information on the basis of the sense modality (visual or auditory) in which it was presented-contributes in part to the disruption by speech. The power of alternative accounts-interference-by-content and attentional capture-to predict these outcomes is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20871175     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  9 in total

Review 1.  The physical environment and child development: an international review.

Authors:  Kim T Ferguson; Rochelle C Cassells; Jack W MacAllister; Gary W Evans
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2013-06-28

2.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

4.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

5.  Updating working memory in aircraft noise and speech noise causes different fMRI activations.

Authors:  Bjørn Saetrevik; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2014-10-28

6.  Distracted While Reading? Changing to a Hard-to-Read Font Shields against the Effects of Environmental Noise and Speech on Text Memory.

Authors:  Niklas Halin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-09

7.  Effects of Task Interruption and Background Speech on Word Processed Writing.

Authors:  Marijke Keus van de Poll; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-04-13

8.  Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing Controversy.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Julie A Kirkby; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-29

9.  Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert Ljung; Anatole Nöstl; Emma Threadgold; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.