Literature DB >> 21234286

The Distracting Effects of a Ringing Cell Phone: An Investigation of the Laboratory and the Classroom Setting.

Jill T Shelton1, Emily M Elliott, Sharon D Lynn, Amanda L Exner.   

Abstract

The detrimental effects of a ringing phone on cognitive performance were investigated in four experiments. In Experiments 1 and 2, the effects of different types of sounds (a standard cell phone ring, irrelevant tones and an instrumental song commonly encountered by participants) on performance were examined. In Experiment 1, slower responses were observed in all auditory groups relative to a silence condition, but participants in the ring and song conditions recovered more slowly. In Experiment 2, participants who were warned about the potential for distraction recovered more quickly, suggesting a benefit of this prior knowledge. This investigation continued in a college classroom setting (Experiments 3a and 3b); students were exposed to a ringing cell phone during the lecture. Performance on a surprise quiz revealed low accuracy rates on material presented while the phone was ringing. These findings offer insight into top-down cognitive processes that moderate involuntary orienting responses associated with a common stimulus encountered in the environment.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21234286      PMCID: PMC3018855          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Psychol        ISSN: 0272-4944


  10 in total

1.  Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.

Authors:  D L Strayer; W A Johnston
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; William A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-03

3.  358,534 nonwords: the ARC Nonword Database.

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Jonathan Harrington; Max Coltheart
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-10

4.  Task switching.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; Alan D Baddeley; Michael P A Page
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; Dennis J Crouch
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.

Authors:  Anja Roye; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm.

Authors:  Stefan Berti; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.386

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

3.  A preliminary investigation regarding the effect of tennis grunting: does white noise during a tennis shot have a negative impact on shot perception?

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

5.  Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland.

Authors:  Severin Haug; Raquel Paz Castro; Min Kwon; Andreas Filler; Tobias Kowatsch; Michael P Schaub
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.756

6.  The potential effect of technology and distractions on undergraduate students' concentration.

Authors:  Najya A Attia; Lubna Baig; Yousef I Marzouk; Anwar Khan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Fatigue, boredom and objectively measured smartphone use at work.

Authors:  Jonas Dora; Madelon van Hooff; Sabine Geurts; Michiel Kompier; Erik Bijleveld
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Distraction: an assessment of smartphone usage in health care work settings.

Authors:  Preetinder S Gill; Ashwini Kamath; Tejkaran S Gill
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  COMPARATIVE OF DISTRACTION FACTORS AMONG MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS OF SARI ALLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES' STUDENTS.

Authors:  Kobra Aligolbandi; Hasan Siamian; Azita Balaghafari; Mohammad Vahedi; Omolbanin Naeimi
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2015-12

10.  Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.