Literature DB >> 2811665

Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.

M J Watkins, E S Sechler.   

Abstract

Recall of the last one or two items of a spoken list is impaired when the list is followed by a nominally irrelevant item. At issue here was whether this suffix effect is reduced with repeated exposure to the irrelevant item. The effect was found to decline over successive blocks of trials, but only slightly (Experiment 1). No decisive evidence for adaptation to the irrelevant item was found when it was spoken after each of the list items rather than after the last one only (Experiments 2 and 3). The strongest evidence for adaptation was obtained when the irrelevant item was repeated in an unbroken stream that extended through the presentations and recall periods of successive lists: The recency effect and the level of recall at the last position within a list were greater under these conditions than when the irrelevant item was presented only once after each list (Experiments 4, 5, and 6).

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2811665     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Listening to one of two synchronous messages.

Authors:  D E BROADBENT
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-07

2.  The role of attention in visual and auditory suffix effects.

Authors:  G J Hitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

3.  Two mechanisms in the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-03

4.  Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; R G Crowder; H A Prussin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-11

5.  Habituation of the orienting response: a gating mechanism subserving selective attention.

Authors:  W F Waters; D G McDonald; R L Koresko
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.

Authors:  J Morton; S M Marcus; P Ottley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

7.  Echoic memory and voice quality: recency recall is not enhanced by varying presentation voice.

Authors:  O C Watkins; M J Watkins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-01

8.  Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Lateral inhibition and echoic memory: some comments on Crowder's (1978) theory.

Authors:  O C Watkins; M J Watkins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-05

10.  Prefix effects in immediate memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1967-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Top-down processing and the suffix effect in young and older adults.

Authors:  Maura Pilotti; Tim Beyer; Mariya Yasunami
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.

Authors:  D C Lecompte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

4.  Visual distinctiveness can enhance recency effects.

Authors:  B H Bornstein; C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.