Literature DB >> 7876775

Grouping in primary memory: the case of the compound suffix.

D C LeCompte1, M J Watkins.   

Abstract

Appending a nominally irrelevant item, or "suffix," to the end of a short list of items impairs recall of the list. Appending a second such item, however, does not increase the impairment. The research reported here shows that the impairment can in fact be increased if the suffix items are physically dissimilar. Thus, Experiments 1-4 show that memory for a sequence of digits is impaired more by the addition of two zeros uttered in different voices than by either a single zero or two zeros uttered in the same voice. Experiment 5 shows a similar pattern of results in the visual modality, with physical similarity defined by typefont. The findings are contrary to at least two theories of the suffix effect but can be accounted for by assuming that physically similar items tend to form a cohesive group.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7876775     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  4 in total

1.  Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Sébastien Tremblay; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

2.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.

Authors:  D C Lecompte
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

4.  Visual distinctiveness can enhance recency effects.

Authors:  B H Bornstein; C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.