Literature DB >> 24203594

Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

J Pratt1.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to a bias against returning visual attention to a location that has been recently attended. Although IOR has been demonstrated in a wide range of detection tasks, it has not been reliably shown in discrimination tasks. The results of the present experiment, in which eye movement responses and a cue-target procedure were used, indicate that IOR can exist in a discrimination task. Moreover, the results indicate that the amount of IOR in the discrimination task was approximately equal to that found in the detection task. The results suggest that IOR will be obtained in a discrimination task if the prior allocation of attention does not yield any useful information concerning the forthcoming discrimination judgment.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203594     DOI: 10.3758/BF03214416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J Driver; B Weaver
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

2.  Negative priming without probe selection.

Authors:  W T Neill; K M Terry; L A Valdes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

3.  The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention.

Authors:  M Shepherd; J M Findlay; R J Hockey
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1986-08

4.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions.

Authors:  H Bekkering; J J Adam; H Kingma; A Huson; H T Whiting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The gap effect and inhibition of return: interactive effects on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks?

Authors:  K M Terry; L A Valdes; W T Neill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

8.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.

Authors:  A B Vivas; L J Fuentes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

4.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  Jim McAuliffe; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

6.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  REFLEXIVE ATTENTION MODULATES PROCESSING OF VISUAL STIMULI IN HUMAN EXTRASTRIATE CORTEX.

Authors:  Joseph B Hopfinger; George R Mangun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  1998-11

8.  Semantic inhibition of return is the exception rather than the rule.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

9.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

10.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.