Literature DB >> 15243730

Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Juan Lupiáñez1, Caroline Decaix, Eric Siéroff, Sylvie Chokron, Bruce Milliken, Paolo Bartolomeo.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is thought to reflect a bias against returning attention to previously attended locations. According to this view, IOR should occur only if attention is withdrawn from the target location prior to target appearance. In the present study, endogenous attention and exogenous cueing were manipulated orthogonally. IOR was observed both when a target appeared at an unexpected location, and when a target appeared at the expected location. A similar pattern of results was obtained in a reanalysis of data from a study with Neglect patients. These results suggest that IOR is independent of endogenous orienting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15243730     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1963-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.

Authors:  S Danziger; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  B J Losier; R M Klein
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients.

Authors:  N Smania; M C Martini; G Gambina; G Tomelleri; A Palamara; E Natale; C A Marzi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  E Làdavas; M Carletti; G Gori
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients.

Authors:  M Husain; K Shapiro; J Martin; C Kennard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prime-trial processing demands and their impact on distractor processing in a spatial negative priming task.

Authors:  Eric Buckolz; Chris Avramidis; Lyndsay Fitzgeorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-03

3.  Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-03

4.  Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Sara C Steenrod; James W Bisley; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

6.  Dopaminergic Control of Attentional Flexibility: Inhibition of Return is Associated with the Dopamine Transporter Gene (DAT1).

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Jay Pratt; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Reduced habituation to angry faces: increased attentional capture as to override inhibition of return.

Authors:  Carolina Pérez-Dueñas; Alberto Acosta; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-21

8.  Left visual neglect: is the disengage deficit space- or object-based?

Authors:  Federica Rastelli; Maria-Jesus Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Christophe Duret; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Social-Emotional Inhibition of Return in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Typical Development.

Authors:  Ligia Antezana; Maya G Mosner; Vanessa Troiani; Benjamin E Yerys
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-04

10.  Brain networks of visuospatial attention and their disruption in visual neglect.

Authors:  Paolo Bartolomeo; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten; Ana B Chica
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.