Literature DB >> 11700899

The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

J Pratt1, J Hillis, J M Gold.   

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted in order to examine the role of cue-target discriminability on early occurring attentional cuing effects and late occurring inhibition of return (IOR). The experiment used a single target stimulus in conjunction with three different cue stimuli. The cues were the same as the target, different in color, shape, and luminance to the target, or did not spatially overlap with the target. At shorter stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; 100 and 200 msec), attentional cuing effects were only found with the nonoverlapping cues. However, at longer SOAs (400 and 800 msec), approximately equal IOR effects were found with all three types of cues. The results indicated that the physical characteristics of the cues and targets affected the pattern of reaction times at the shorter SOAs but not at the longer SOAs. The conclusion is that the biphasic pattern of early facilitation and late inhibition following a peripheral cue should not be considered the definitive signature of the peripheral cuing paradigm.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700899     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reallocation of visual attention.

Authors:  R Egly; D Homa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Inhibition of return to color: a replication and nonextension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995)

Authors:  T L Taylor; R M Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-11

4.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

5.  Visual Attentional Orienting in Developing Hockey Players

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-02

6.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.

Authors:  G Tassinari; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  13 in total

1.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

3.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

4.  The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  Jim McAuliffe; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

5.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

7.  Why does the effect of short-SOA exogenous cuing on simple RT depend on the number of display locations?

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff; Rose Halterman; Peggy Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

8.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

9.  Out with the new, in with the old: Exogenous orienting to locations with physically constant stimulation.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

10.  Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.