Literature DB >> 15000537

Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Arthur G Samuel1, Donna Kat.   

Abstract

Immediately after a stimulus appears in the visual field, there is often a short period of facilitated processing of stimuli at or near this location. This period is followed by one in which processing is impaired, rather than facilitated. This impairment has been termed inhibition of return (IOR). In the present study, the time course of this phenomenon was examined in two ways. (1) A graphical meta-analysis plotted the size of the effect as a function of the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of the two stimuli. This analysis showed that IOR is impressively stable for SOAs of 300-1,600 msec. It also showed that the literature does not provide any clear sense of the duration of IOR. (2) An empirical approach was, therefore, taken to fill this gap in our knowledge of IOR. In three experiments, IOR was tested using SOAs between 600 and 4,200 msec. IOR was robust for approximately 3 sec and appeared to taper off after this point; the observed duration varied somewhat as a function of the testing conditions. In addition, for the first second, the degree of inhibition was inversely related to distance of the target from the original stimulus, but for the next 2 sec this spatial distribution was not observed. Theories of the mechanisms and function of IOR must conform to these spatial and temporal properties.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000537     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.

Authors:  S Danziger; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

3.  An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return.

Authors:  J J McDonald; L M Ward; K A Kiehl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-10

4.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

6.  Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.

Authors:  L Riggio; A Bello; C Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1998

7.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

8.  Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.

Authors:  G Tassinari; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  48 in total

1.  Response priming with apparent motion primes.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-20

2.  Focal spatial attention can eliminate inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

5.  Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Martijn J M Lamers; Ardi Roelofs; Inge M Rabeling-Keus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

6.  Rapid onset and long-term inhibition of return in the multiple cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-14

7.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

Review 9.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 10.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.