Literature DB >> 2531204

Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

R D Rafal1, P A Calabresi, C W Brennan, T K Sciolto.   

Abstract

We measured manual reaction time in normal human subjects to confirm that an eccentric visual signal has a biphasic effect on covert attention and eye movements. First, it summons attention and biases a saccade toward the signal; a subsequent inhibition of return then slows responses to signals at that location. A temporal hemifield dominance for inhibition of return was shown; this finding converges with observations in neurologic patients to suggest that it is mediated by midbrain pathways. Endogenous orienting of attention, from a central arrow cue, did not activate inhibition of return, whereas endogenous saccade preparation did so as effectively as an exogenous signal, even when no saccade was made. Inhibition of return is activated by midbrain oculomotor pathways and may function as a location "tagging" mechanism to optimize efficiency of visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2531204     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  92 in total

1.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Inhibition of return in static and dynamic displays.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; Christina S McCrae; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

5.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

6.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

7.  Oculomotor readiness and covert orienting: differences between central and peripheral precues.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; R Fendrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

8.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.