Literature DB >> 8768183

Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.

W C Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is the name that has been assigned to a response time (RT) delay to a stimulus presented at a recently stimulated spatial location. A commonly held explanation for the origins of IOR is that perceptual processing in inhibited and that this inhibition translates into slower RT. Three experiments with 10 subjects were used to directly test this perceptual explanation. The first two experiments assessed the level of perceptual facilitation present in the IOR paradigm using the frequency and latency of illusory line motion judgments. Contrary to the predictions of the perceptual view, the line motion and RT measures revealed only speeded processing at previously stimulated spatial locations. Experiment 3 required a simple detection response and used the same stimulus and timing parameters as those in Experiments 1 and 2. IOR was present, replicating the recent finding that judgments based on perceptual qualities of the stimulus do not demonstrate a RT delay, whereas simple detection tasks do show RT inhibition at previously stimulated locations. These findings are discussed in relation to a number of hypotheses about the origin of the RT delay.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8768183     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; C W Pokorny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.

Authors:  H W Kwak; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

3.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

4.  Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: a reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996).

Authors:  R A Abrams; J Pratt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes.

Authors:  G Tassinari; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Visual attention revealed by an illusion of motion.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.304

9.  A high-speed point plotter for vision research.

Authors:  G Finley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  4 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

3.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cancelling Flash Illusory Line Motion by Cancelling the Attentional Gradient and a Consideration of Consciousness.

Authors:  Katie McGuire; Amanda Pinny; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.