Literature DB >> 11495120

Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.

A B Vivas1, L J Fuentes.   

Abstract

In previous research, we have shown that the processing of targets that are presented to locations subject to inhibition of return (IOR) is affected by an inhibitory tagging mechanism. This mechanism acts by disconnecting activated representations of stimuli at inhibited locations from their associated responses. In two experiments, we assessed whether this inhibitory tagging mechanism of visual attention is also applied to task-irrelevant but prepotent dimensions of target stimuli, such as words in the Stroop task. To test this hypothesis, we examined the Stroop effect in an IOR procedure. The results showed that (1) IOR can be found in a color discrimination task, (2) the Stroop interference was reduced (Experiment 1) or eliminated (Experiment 2) when stimuli appeared at cued locations, as compared with cases in which they were presented at uncued locations, and (3) the effect of inhibitory tagging was limited to the shortest stimulus onset asynchrony value, replicating previous findings. These results agree with the idea that inhibitory tagging, occurring in IOR, affects the efficiency with which color words compete for responses in Stroop-like situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495120     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.

Authors:  Andrés Catena; Luis J Fuentes; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J Driver; B Weaver
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

4.  Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.

Authors:  J Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03

5.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  Adult age differences in the inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J M Kieley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-12

8.  The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.

Authors:  A Henik; F J Friedrich; W A Kellogg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

9.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: evidence from the stroop task.

Authors:  L J Fuentes; M Boucart; A B Vivas; R Alvarez; M A Zimmerman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  11 in total

1.  The time course of alerting effect over orienting in the attention network test.

Authors:  Luis J Fuentes; Guillermo Campoy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

3.  Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return: evidence from flanker interference with multiple distractor features.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Luis J Fuentes; Angeles F Estevez; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

Review 4.  Attentional orienting and response inhibition: insights from spatial-temporal neuroimaging.

Authors:  Yin Tian; Shanshan Liang; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Biasing the organism for novelty: A pervasive property of the attention system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Luis J Fuentes; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jong Moon Choi; Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

7.  Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Zhenzhu Yue; Ming Zhang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27

9.  Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ming Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Behavioral and neural interaction between spatial inhibition of return and the Simon effect.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Luis J Fuentes; Ana B Vivas; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.