OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of combined automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection and iterative reconstructions (IRs) for optimising computed tomography (CT) imaging of hypodense liver lesions. METHODS: A liver phantom containing hypodense lesions was imaged by CT with and without automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection (80, 100 and 120 kVp). Acquisitions were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed IR. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two readers marked lesion localisation and rated confidence, sharpness, noise and image quality on a five-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). RESULTS: Image noise was lower (31-52%) and CNR higher (43-102%) on IR than on FBP images at all tube voltages. On 100-kVp and 80-kVp IR images, confidence and sharpness were higher than on 120-kVp FBP images. Scores for image quality score and noise as well as sensitivity for 100-kVp IR were similar or higher than for 120-kVp FBP and lower for 80-kVp IR. Radiation dose was reduced by 26% at 100 kVp and 56% at 80 kVp. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 120-kVp FBP images, the combination of automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection at 100 kVp and IR provides higher image quality and improved sensitivity for detecting hypodense liver lesions in vitro at a dose reduced by 26%. KEY POINTS: • Combining automated tube voltage selection/iterative CT reconstruction improves image quality. • Attenuation values remain stable on IR compared with FBP images. • Lesion detection was highest on 100-kVp IR images.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of combined automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection and iterative reconstructions (IRs) for optimising computed tomography (CT) imaging of hypodense liver lesions. METHODS: A liver phantom containing hypodense lesions was imaged by CT with and without automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection (80, 100 and 120 kVp). Acquisitions were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed IR. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Two readers marked lesion localisation and rated confidence, sharpness, noise and image quality on a five-point scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). RESULTS: Image noise was lower (31-52%) and CNR higher (43-102%) on IR than on FBP images at all tube voltages. On 100-kVp and 80-kVp IR images, confidence and sharpness were higher than on 120-kVp FBP images. Scores for image quality score and noise as well as sensitivity for 100-kVp IR were similar or higher than for 120-kVp FBP and lower for 80-kVp IR. Radiation dose was reduced by 26% at 100 kVp and 56% at 80 kVp. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 120-kVp FBP images, the combination of automated attenuation-based tube-potential selection at 100 kVp and IR provides higher image quality and improved sensitivity for detecting hypodense liver lesions in vitro at a dose reduced by 26%. KEY POINTS: • Combining automated tube voltage selection/iterative CT reconstruction improves image quality. • Attenuation values remain stable on IR compared with FBP images. • Lesion detection was highest on 100-kVp IR images.
Authors: Stephan Baumueller; Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Robert Goetti; Thomas Flohr; Erich W Russi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Young Joo Suh; Young Jin Kim; Sae Rom Hong; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Jin Hur; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mark E Baker; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Nancy A Obuchowski; David Einstein; Namita Gandhi; Brian R Herts; Andrei Purysko; Erick Remer; Neil Vachhani; Neil Vachani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Daniele Marin; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Rajan T Gupta; Lisa M Ho; Brian C Allen; Sebastian T Schindera; James G Colsher; Ehsan Samei; Rendon C Nelson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Saebeom Hur; Jeong Min Lee; Soo Jin Kim; Ji Hoon Park; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Sonja Gordic; Lotus Desbiolles; Martin Sedlmair; Robert Manka; André Plass; Bernhard Schmidt; Daniela B Husarik; Francesco Maisano; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Doris Leithner; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Martin Beeres; Julian L Wichmann; Scherwin Mahmoudi; Simon S Martin; Lukas Lenga; Moritz H Albrecht; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Jan-Erik Scholtz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Doris Leithner; Julian L Wichmann; Scherwin Mahmoudi; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Thomas J Vogl; Jan-Erik Scholtz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: A Euler; T Heye; M Kekelidze; G Bongartz; Z Szucs-Farkas; C Sommer; B Schmidt; Sebastian T Schindera Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jan-Erik Scholtz; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Moritz H Albrecht; Martin Beeres; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas J Vogl; Boris Bodelle Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 5.315