Literature DB >> 15759703

On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches.

Laurent Demany1, Christophe Ramos.   

Abstract

It is difficult to hear out individually the components of a "chord" of equal-amplitude pure tones with synchronous onsets and offsets. In the present study, this was confirmed using 300-ms random (inharmonic) chords with components at least 1/2 octave apart. Following each chord, after a variable silent delay, listeners were presented with a single pure tone which was either identical to one component of the chord or halfway in frequency between two components. These two types of sequence could not be reliably discriminated from each other. However, it was also found that if the single tone following the chord was instead slightly (e.g., 1/12 octave) lower or higher in frequency than one of its components, the same listeners were sensitive to this relation. They could perceive a pitch shift in the corresponding direction. Thus, it is possible to perceive a shift in a nonperceived frequency/pitch. This paradoxical phenomenon provides psychophysical evidence for the existence of automatic "frequency-shift detectors" in the human auditory system. The data reported here suggest that such detectors operate at an early stage of auditory scene analysis but can be activated by a pair of sounds separated by a few seconds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15759703     DOI: 10.1121/1.1850209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal; Jean-René Cazalets; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reduced contribution of a nonsimultaneous mistuned harmonic to residue pitch: the role of harmonic number.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Mark A Stellmack; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.