Literature DB >> 24072356

Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Shuai Liu1, Yujie Wu, Teng Lin, Robert Abel, Jonathan P Redmann, Christopher M Summa, Vivian R Jaber, Nathan M Lim, David L Mobley.   

Abstract

Alchemical free energy calculations hold increasing promise as an aid to drug discovery efforts. However, applications of these techniques in discovery projects have been relatively few, partly because of the difficulty of planning and setting up calculations. Here, we introduce lead optimization mapper, LOMAP, an automated algorithm to plan efficient relative free energy calculations between potential ligands within a substantial library of perhaps hundreds of compounds. In this approach, ligands are first grouped by structural similarity primarily based on the size of a (loosely defined) maximal common substructure, and then calculations are planned within and between sets of structurally related compounds. An emphasis is placed on ensuring that relative free energies can be obtained between any pair of compounds without combining the results of too many different relative free energy calculations (to avoid accumulation of error) and by providing some redundancy to allow for the possibility of error and consistency checking and provide some insight into when results can be expected to be unreliable. The algorithm is discussed in detail and a Python implementation, based on both Schrödinger's and OpenEye's APIs, has been made available freely under the BSD license.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072356      PMCID: PMC3837551          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-013-9678-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  49 in total

1.  Can free energy calculations be fast and accurate at the same time? Binding of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the src protein.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot; Xavier Rozanska; Surjit B Dixit
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

4.  Nonlinear scaling schemes for Lennard-Jones interactions in free energy calculations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; David L Mobley; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Strategies and tactics for optimizing the Hit-to-Lead process and beyond--a computational chemistry perspective.

Authors:  Charles J Manly; Jayaraman Chandrasekhar; Joseph W Ochterski; Jack D Hammer; Benjamin B Warfield
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Molecular modeling-guided site-directed mutagenesis of cytochrome P450 2D6.

Authors:  Chris de Graaf; Chris Oostenbrink; Peter H J Keizers; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; Robert A B van Waterschoot; Richard A Tschirret-Guth; Jan N M Commandeur; Nico P E Vermeulen
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Design, synthesis, and SAR of cis-1,2-diaminocyclohexane derivatives as potent factor Xa inhibitors. Part II: exploration of 6-6 fused rings as alternative S1 moieties.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshikawa; Shozo Kobayashi; Yumi Nakamoto; Noriyasu Haginoya; Satoshi Komoriya; Toshiharu Yoshino; Tsutomu Nagata; Akiyoshi Mochizuki; Kengo Watanabe; Makoto Suzuki; Hideyuki Kanno; Toshiharu Ohta
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  31 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations?

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Lingle Wang; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Willem Jespers; Johan Åqvist; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Predicting Binding Free Energies in a Large Combinatorial Chemical Space Using Multisite λ Dynamics.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Kira A Armacost; Ryan L Hayes; Garrett B Goh; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  The importance of protonation and tautomerization in relative binding affinity prediction: a comparison of AMBER TI and Schrödinger FEP.

Authors:  Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Tai-Sung Lee; David A Case; Darrin M York; Zhuyan Guo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Christina Athanasiou; Sofia Vasilakaki; Dimitris Dellis; Zoe Cournia
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Biasing Potential Replica Exchange Multisite λ-Dynamics for Efficient Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Kira A Armacost; Garrett B Goh; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Sensitivity in Binding Free Energies Due to Protein Reorganization.

Authors:  Nathan M Lim; Lingle Wang; Robert Abel; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.