Literature DB >> 33759129

Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.

Willem Jespers1, Johan Åqvist1, Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán2.   

Abstract

Computational prediction of protein-ligand binding involves initial determination of the binding mode and subsequent evaluation of the strength of the protein-ligand interactions, which directly correlates with ligand binding affinities. As a consequence of increasing computer power, rigorous approaches to calculate protein-ligand binding affinities, such as free energy perturbation (FEP) methods, are becoming an essential part of the toolbox of computer-aided drug design. In this chapter, we provide a general overview of these methods and introduce the QFEP modules, which are open-source API workflows based on our molecular dynamics (MD) package Q. The module QligFEP allows estimation of relative binding affinities along ligand series, while QresFEP is a module to estimate binding affinity shifts caused by single-point mutations of the protein. We herein provide guidelines for the use of each of these modules based on data extracted from ligand-design projects. While these modules are stand-alone, the combined use of the two workflows in a drug-design project yields complementary perspectives of the ligand binding problem, providing two sides of the same coin. The selected case studies illustrate how to use QFEP to approach the two key questions associated with ligand binding prediction: identifying the most favorable binding mode from different alternatives and establishing structure-affinity relationships that allow the rational optimization of hit compounds.

Keywords:  Binding free energy; Free energy perturbation (FEP); Molecular dynamics (MD); Structure-based drug design (SBDD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33759129     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1209-5_12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  39 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  FESetup: Automating Setup for Alchemical Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Hannes H Loeffler; Julien Michel; Christopher Woods
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Accuracy assessment and automation of free energy calculations for drug design.

Authors:  Clara D Christ; Thomas Fox
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  LigParGen web server: an automatic OPLS-AA parameter generator for organic ligands.

Authors:  Leela S Dodda; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  FEW: a workflow tool for free energy calculations of ligand binding.

Authors:  Nadine Homeyer; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Zoe Cournia; Bryce Allen; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Improved Peptide and Protein Torsional Energetics with the OPLSAA Force Field.

Authors:  Michael J Robertson; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  3 in total

1.  A highly accurate metadynamics-based Dissociation Free Energy method to calculate protein-protein and protein-ligand binding potencies.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Alexey Ishchenko; Wei Zhang; Asghar Razavi; David Langley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Identification of natural inhibitor against L1 β-lactamase present in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Authors:  Sreenithya K H; Dhananjay Jade; Michael A Harrison; Shobana Sugumar
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  A Computer-Driven Scaffold-Hopping Approach Generating New PTP1B Inhibitors from the Pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline Core.

Authors:  Javier García-Marín; Mercedes Griera; Ramón Alajarín; Manuel Rodríguez-Puyol; Diego Rodríguez-Puyol; Juan J Vaquero
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.