Literature DB >> 26579773

Biasing Potential Replica Exchange Multisite λ-Dynamics for Efficient Free Energy Calculations.

Kira A Armacost1, Garrett B Goh1, Charles L Brooks1.   

Abstract

Traditional free energy calculation methods are well-known for their drawbacks in scalability and speed in converging results particularly for calculations with large perturbations. In the present work, we report on the development of biasing potential replica exchange multisite λ-dynamics (BP-REX MSλD), which is a free energy method that is capable of performing simultaneous alchemical free energy transformations, including perturbations between flexible moieties. BP-REX MSλD and the original MSλD are applied to a series of symmetrical 2,5-benzoquinone derivatives covering a diverse chemical space and range of conformational flexibility. Improved λ-space sampling is observed for the BP-REX MSλD simulations, yielding a 2-5-fold increase in the number of transitions between substituents compared to traditional MSλD. We also demonstrate the efficacy of varying the value of c, the parameter that controls the ruggedness of the landscape mediating the sampling of λ-states, based on the flexibility of the fragment. Finally, we developed a protocol for maximizing the transition frequency between fragments. This protocol reduces the "kinetic barrier" for alchemically transforming fragments by grouping and ordering based on volume. These findings are applied to a challenging test set involving a series of geldanamycin-based inhibitors of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). Even though the perturbations span volume changes by as large as 60 Å(3), the values for the free energy change achieve an average unsigned error (AUE) of 1.5 kcal/mol relative to experimental Kd measurements with a reasonable correlation (R = 0.56). Our results suggest that the BP-REX MSλD algorithm is a highly efficient and scalable free energy method, which when utilized will enable routine calculations on the order of hundreds of compounds using only a few simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26579773      PMCID: PMC4731093          DOI: 10.1021/ct500894k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  42 in total

Review 1.  Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries.

Authors:  P Willett
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  A Novel Hamiltonian Replica Exchange MD Protocol to Enhance Protein Conformational Space Sampling.

Authors:  Roman Affentranger; Ivano Tavernelli; Ernesto E Di Iorio
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Temperature weighted histogram analysis method, replica exchange, and transition paths.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Michael Andrec; Anthony K Felts; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

Review 6.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Prabhu Raman; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer.

Authors:  Jane Trepel; Mehdi Mollapour; Giuseppe Giaccone; Len Neckers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Crystal structure and molecular modeling of 17-DMAG in complex with human Hsp90.

Authors:  Joseph M Jez; Julian C-H Chen; Giulio Rastelli; Robert M Stroud; Daniel V Santi
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2003-04

10.  An improved route to 19-substituted geldanamycins as novel Hsp90 inhibitors--potential therapeutics in cancer and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Russell R A Kitson; Christopher J Moody
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  15 in total

1.  Exploring pH Dependent Host/Guest Binding Affinities.

Authors:  Thomas J Paul; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Predicting Binding Free Energies in a Large Combinatorial Chemical Space Using Multisite λ Dynamics.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Kira A Armacost; Ryan L Hayes; Garrett B Goh; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  The importance of protonation and tautomerization in relative binding affinity prediction: a comparison of AMBER TI and Schrödinger FEP.

Authors:  Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Tai-Sung Lee; David A Case; Darrin M York; Zhuyan Guo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Thomas J Paul; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Sampling Conformational Changes of Bound Ligands Using Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Sukanya Sasmal; Samuel C Gill; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 8.  CHARMM-GUI 10 years for biomolecular modeling and simulation.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Xi Cheng; Jumin Lee; Seonghoon Kim; Sang-Jun Park; Dhilon S Patel; Andrew H Beaven; Kyu Il Lee; Huan Rui; Soohyung Park; Hui Sun Lee; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell; Jeffrey B Klauda; Yifei Qi; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics and Rao-Blackwell Estimator for Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.