Literature DB >> 16365699

Can free energy calculations be fast and accurate at the same time? Binding of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the src protein.

Christophe Chipot1, Xavier Rozanska, Surjit B Dixit.   

Abstract

The usefulness of free-energy calculations in non-academic environments, in general, and in the pharmaceutical industry, in particular, is a long-time debated issue, often considered from the angle of cost/performance criteria. In the context of the rational drug design of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the (pp60)src tyrosine kinase, the continuing difficulties encountered in an attempt to obtain accurate free-energy estimates are addressed. free-energy calculations can provide a convincing answer, assuming that two key-requirements are fulfilled: (i) thorough sampling of the configurational space is necessary to minimize the statistical error, hence raising the question: to which extent can we sacrifice the computational effort, yet without jeopardizing the precision of the free-energy calculation? (ii) the sensitivity of binding free-energies to the parameters utilized imposes an appropriate parametrization of the potential energy function, especially for non-peptide molecules that are usually poorly described by multipurpose macromolecular force fields. Employing the free-energy perturbation method, accurate ranking, within +/-0.7 kcal/mol, is obtained in the case of four non-peptide mimes of a sequence recognized by the (pp60)src SH2 domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365699     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-005-9021-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  7 in total

1.  Rational determination of charge distributions for free energy calculations.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Principles governing the binding of a class of non-peptidic inhibitors to the SH2 domain of src studied by X-ray analysis.

Authors:  Gudrun Lange; Dominique Lesuisse; Pierre Deprez; Bernard Schoot; Petra Loenze; Didier Bénard; Jean-Pierre Marquette; Pierre Broto; Edoardo Sarubbi; Eliane Mandine
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Free energy calculations and ligand binding.

Authors:  Bjørn O Brandsdal; Fredrik Osterberg; Martin Almlöf; Isabella Feierberg; Victor B Luzhkov; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

4.  Insights into the recognition and association of transmembrane alpha-helices. The free energy of alpha-helix dimerization in glycophorin A.

Authors:  Jérôme Hénin; Andrew Pohorille; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Hidden thermodynamics of mutant proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis.

Authors:  J Gao; K Kuczera; B Tidor; M Karplus
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Requirements for specific binding of low affinity inhibitor fragments to the SH2 domain of (pp60)Src are identical to those for high affinity binding of full length inhibitors.

Authors:  Gudrun Lange; Dominique Lesuisse; Pierre Deprez; Bernard Schoot; Petra Loenze; Didier Bénard; Jean-Pierre Marquette; Pierre Broto; Edoardo Sarubbi; Eliane Mandine
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Targeted disruption of the c-src proto-oncogene leads to osteopetrosis in mice.

Authors:  P Soriano; C Montgomery; R Geske; A Bradley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

  7 in total
  22 in total

1.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands.

Authors:  Stefano Costanzi; Irina G Tikhonova; T Kendall Harden; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Assessing protein-ligand binding modes with computational tools: the case of PDE4B.

Authors:  Gülşah Çifci; Viktorya Aviyente; E Demet Akten; Gerald Monard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; David S Cerutti; Dan Mermelstein; Charles Lin; Scott LeGrand; Timothy J Giese; Adrian Roitberg; David A Case; Ross C Walker; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Enhancing Side Chain Rotamer Sampling Using Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Kalistyn H Burley; Samuel C Gill; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Thermodynamic Cycle Without Turning Off Self-Interactions: Formal Discussion and a Numerical Example.

Authors:  Mauro L Mugnai; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.