Literature DB >> 18171044

Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

David L Mobley1, Ken A Dill, John D Chodera.   

Abstract

Implicit solvent models are increasingly popular for estimating aqueous solvation (hydration) free energies in molecular simulations and other applications. In many cases, parameters for these models are derived to reproduce experimental values for small molecule hydration free energies. Often, these hydration free energies are computed for a single solute conformation, neglecting solute conformational changes upon solvation. Here, we incorporate these effects using alchemical free energy methods. We find significant errors when hydration free energies are estimated using only a single solute conformation, even for relatively small, simple, rigid solutes. For example, we find conformational entropy (TDeltaS) changes of up to 2.3 kcal/mol upon hydration. Interestingly, these changes in conformational entropy correlate poorly (R2 = 0.03) with the number of rotatable bonds. The present study illustrates that implicit solvent modeling can be improved by eliminating the approximation that solutes are rigid.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18171044      PMCID: PMC2745223          DOI: 10.1021/jp0764384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  29 in total

Review 1.  Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects.

Authors:  D Bashford; D A Case
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.703

2.  The importance of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions with interior atoms of biopolymers.

Authors:  J W Pitera; W F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Atomistic protein folding simulations on the submillisecond time scale using worldwide distributed computing.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Ian Baker; Jarrod Chapman; Sidney P Elmer; Siraj Khaliq; Stefan M Larson; Young Min Rhee; Michael R Shirts; Christopher D Snow; Eric J Sorin; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium measurements using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Eric Bair; Giles Hooker; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes: enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; John J Irwin; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms.

Authors:  Jason A Wagoner; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  41 in total

1.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation.

Authors:  Zhan Chen; Nathan A Baker; G W Wei
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge.

Authors:  Enrico O Purisima; Christopher R Corbeil; Traian Sulea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Analysis of SM8 and Zap TK calculations and their geometric sensitivity.

Authors:  Benjamin A Ellingson; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL2 and continuum modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Stanislaw Wlodek; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Predicting hydration free energies using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and multiple starting conformations.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Predictions of hydration free energies from continuum solvent with solute polarizable models: the SAMPL2 blind challenge.

Authors:  Alexandre Meunier; Jean-François Truchon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Dependency of ligand free energy landscapes on charge parameters and solvent models.

Authors:  Yuko Okamoto; Toshimasa Tanaka; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Nonlocal Electrostatics in Spherical Geometries Using Eigenfunction Expansions of Boundary-Integral Operators.

Authors:  Jaydeep P Bardhan; Matthew G Knepley; Peter Brune
Journal:  Mol Based Math Biol       Date:  2015-01

10.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.