Literature DB >> 24063748

Statistical design for biospecimen cohort size in proteomics-based biomarker discovery and verification studies.

Steven J Skates1, Michael A Gillette, Joshua LaBaer, Steven A Carr, Leigh Anderson, Daniel C Liebler, David Ransohoff, Nader Rifai, Marina Kondratovich, Živana Težak, Elizabeth Mansfield, Ann L Oberg, Ian Wright, Grady Barnes, Mitchell Gail, Mehdi Mesri, Christopher R Kinsinger, Henry Rodriguez, Emily S Boja.   

Abstract

Protein biomarkers are needed to deepen our understanding of cancer biology and to improve our ability to diagnose, monitor, and treat cancers. Important analytical and clinical hurdles must be overcome to allow the most promising protein biomarker candidates to advance into clinical validation studies. Although contemporary proteomics technologies support the measurement of large numbers of proteins in individual clinical specimens, sample throughput remains comparatively low. This problem is amplified in typical clinical proteomics research studies, which routinely suffer from a lack of proper experimental design, resulting in analysis of too few biospecimens to achieve adequate statistical power at each stage of a biomarker pipeline. To address this critical shortcoming, a joint workshop was held by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) with participation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). An important output from the workshop was a statistical framework for the design of biomarker discovery and verification studies. Herein, we describe the use of quantitative clinical judgments to set statistical criteria for clinical relevance and the development of an approach to calculate biospecimen sample size for proteomic studies in discovery and verification stages prior to clinical validation stage. This represents a first step toward building a consensus on quantitative criteria for statistical design of proteomics biomarker discovery and verification research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24063748      PMCID: PMC4039197          DOI: 10.1021/pr400132j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  41 in total

1.  Interlaboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma.

Authors:  Eric Kuhn; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; D R Mani; Angela M Jackson; Lei Zhao; Matthew E Pope; Derek Smith; Keith D Rivera; N Leigh Anderson; Steven J Skates; Terry W Pearson; Amanda G Paulovich; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications.

Authors:  John R Yates; Cristian I Ruse; Aleksey Nakorchevsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Probability that a two-stage genome-wide association study will detect a disease-associated snp and implications for multistage designs.

Authors:  M H Gail; R M Pfeiffer; W Wheeler; D Pee
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Susan E Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; Steven J Skates; D R Mani; David M Bunk; Clifford H Spiegelman; Lisa J Zimmerman; Amy-Joan L Ham; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven C Hall; Simon Allen; Ronald K Blackman; Christoph H Borchers; Charles Buck; Helene L Cardasis; Michael P Cusack; Nathan G Dodder; Bradford W Gibson; Jason M Held; Tara Hiltke; Angela Jackson; Eric B Johansen; Christopher R Kinsinger; Jing Li; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Richard K Niles; Trenton C Pulsipher; David Ransohoff; Henry Rodriguez; Paul A Rudnick; Derek Smith; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan M Variyath; Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto; Asa Wahlander; Sofia Waldemarson; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; N Leigh Anderson; Susan J Fisher; Daniel C Liebler; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Paul Tempst; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Sample size tables for computer-aided detection studies.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Biomarker discovery for heterogeneous diseases.

Authors:  Garrick Wallstrom; Karen S Anderson; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  A list of candidate cancer biomarkers for targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Malu Polanski; N Leigh Anderson
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07

10.  The human proteome - a scientific opportunity for transforming diagnostics, therapeutics, and healthcare.

Authors:  Marc Vidal; Daniel W Chan; Mark Gerstein; Matthias Mann; Gilbert S Omenn; Danilo Tagle; Salvatore Sechi
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.988

View more
  46 in total

1.  Improving the quality of biomarker discovery research: the right samples and enough of them.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Christopher I Li; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Current application of proteomics in biomarker discovery for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Patrick Py Chan; Valerie C Wasinger; Rupert W Leong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

3.  Reverse-polynomial dilution calibration methodology extends lower limit of quantification and reduces relative residual error in targeted peptide measurements in blood plasma.

Authors:  Yunki Y Yau; Xizi Duo; Rupert W L Leong; Valerie C Wasinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Developing Peripheral Blood Gene Expression-Based Diagnostic Tests for Coronary Artery Disease: a Review.

Authors:  Brian Rhees; James A Wingrove
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Serological Epithelial Component Proteins Identify Intestinal Complications in Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Yunki Y Yau; Rupert W L Leong; Aviv Pudipeddi; Diane Redmond; Valerie C Wasinger
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank: An Innovative Approach To Biobanking In Acute Care.

Authors:  Jessica L Saben; Shelby K Shelton; Andrew J Hopkinson; Brandon J Sonn; Eleanor B Mills; Makayla Welham; Megan Westmoreland; Richard Zane; Adit A Ginde; Kelly Bookman; Justin Oeth; Mark Chavez; Michael DeVivo; Alison Lakin; John Heldens; Laurie Blumberg Romero; Michael J Ames; Emily R Roberts; Matthew Taylor; Kristy Crooks; Stephen J Wicks; Kathleen C Barnes; Andrew A Monte
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  A statistical challenge: developing tests for biomarker utility specific to the intended use.

Authors:  Steven J Skates
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Targeted proteomics: a bridge between discovery and validation.

Authors:  Robert Harlan; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.940

9.  Comprehensive Proteome Profiling of Platelet Identified a Protein Profile Predictive of Responses to An Antiplatelet Agent Sarpogrelate.

Authors:  Hangyeore Lee; Sehyun Chae; Jisook Park; Jingi Bae; Eun-Bi Go; Su-Jin Kim; Hokeun Kim; Daehee Hwang; Sang-Won Lee; Soo-Youn Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Evaluating the effects of preanalytical variables on the stability of the human plasma proteome.

Authors:  Maria E Hassis; Richard K Niles; Miles N Braten; Matthew E Albertolle; H Ewa Witkowska; Carl A Hubel; Susan J Fisher; Katherine E Williams
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.