Literature DB >> 22199228

Interlaboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma.

Eric Kuhn1, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, D R Mani, Angela M Jackson, Lei Zhao, Matthew E Pope, Derek Smith, Keith D Rivera, N Leigh Anderson, Steven J Skates, Terry W Pearson, Amanda G Paulovich, Steven A Carr.   

Abstract

The inability to quantify large numbers of proteins in tissues and biofluids with high precision, sensitivity, and throughput is a major bottleneck in biomarker studies. We previously demonstrated that coupling immunoaffinity enrichment using anti-peptide antibodies (SISCAPA) to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) produces Immunoprecipitation MRM-MS (immuno-MRM-MS) assays that can be multiplexed to quantify proteins in plasma with high sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Here we report the first systematic evaluation of the interlaboratory performance of multiplexed (8-plex) immuno-MRM-MS in three independent labs. A staged study was carried out in which the effect of each processing and analysis step on assay coefficient of variance, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and recovery was evaluated. Limits of detection were at or below 1 ng/ml for the assayed proteins in 30 μl of plasma. Assay reproducibility was acceptable for verification studies, with median intra- and interlaboratory coefficients of variance above the limit of quantification of 11% and <14%, respectively, for the entire immuno-MRM-MS assay process, including enzymatic digestion of plasma. Trypsin digestion and its requisite sample handling contributed the most to assay variability and reduced the recovery of target peptides from digested proteins. Using a stable isotope-labeled protein as an internal standard instead of stable isotope-labeled peptides to account for losses in the digestion process nearly doubled assay accuracy for this while improving assay precision 5%. Our results demonstrate that multiplexed immuno-MRM-MS can be made reproducible across independent laboratories and has the potential to be adopted widely for assaying proteins in matrices as complex as plasma.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199228      PMCID: PMC3433918          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  37 in total

1.  The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: The tar pit of the protein biomarker pipeline.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pei Wang
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Online high-flow peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and nanoflow LC-MS/MS: assay development for total salivary pepsin/pepsinogen.

Authors:  Hendrik Neubert; Jeremy Gale; David Muirhead
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Quantitative clinical proteomics by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: assessing the platform.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Virginie Brun; Alain Dupuis; Annie Adrait; Marlène Marcellin; Damien Thomas; Magali Court; François Vandenesch; Jérôme Garin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Susan E Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; Steven J Skates; D R Mani; David M Bunk; Clifford H Spiegelman; Lisa J Zimmerman; Amy-Joan L Ham; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven C Hall; Simon Allen; Ronald K Blackman; Christoph H Borchers; Charles Buck; Helene L Cardasis; Michael P Cusack; Nathan G Dodder; Bradford W Gibson; Jason M Held; Tara Hiltke; Angela Jackson; Eric B Johansen; Christopher R Kinsinger; Jing Li; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Richard K Niles; Trenton C Pulsipher; David Ransohoff; Henry Rodriguez; Paul A Rudnick; Derek Smith; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan M Variyath; Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto; Asa Wahlander; Sofia Waldemarson; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; N Leigh Anderson; Susan J Fisher; Daniel C Liebler; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Paul Tempst; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Weighted least-squares approach to calculating limits of detection and quantification by modeling variability as a function of concentration.

Authors:  M E Zorn; R D Gibbons; W C Sonzogni
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  A pipeline that integrates the discovery and verification of plasma protein biomarkers reveals candidate markers for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Xu Shi; Hasmik Keshishian; D R Mani; Michael Burgess; Michael A Gillette; Karl R Clauser; Dongxiao Shen; Gregory D Lewis; Laurie A Farrell; Michael A Fifer; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution.

Authors:  Hasmik Keshishian; Terri Addona; Michael Burgess; D R Mani; Xu Shi; Eric Kuhn; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  An immunoaffinity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for the quantitation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in mouse serum.

Authors:  Mireia Fernández Ocaña; Hendrik Neubert
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  62 in total

1.  Online Peptide fractionation using a multiphasic microfluidic liquid chromatography chip improves reproducibility and detection limits for quantitation in discovery and targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Christoph Krisp; Hao Yang; Remco van Soest; Mark P Molloy
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Multiplexed, Quantitative Workflow for Sensitive Biomarker Discovery in Plasma Yields Novel Candidates for Early Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Hasmik Keshishian; Michael W Burgess; Michael A Gillette; Philipp Mertins; Karl R Clauser; D R Mani; Eric W Kuhn; Laurie A Farrell; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Domain-specific Quantification of Prion Protein in Cerebrospinal Fluid by Targeted Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Eric Vallabh Minikel; Eric Kuhn; Alexandra R Cocco; Sonia M Vallabh; Christina R Hartigan; Andrew G Reidenbach; Jiri G Safar; Gregory J Raymond; Michael D McCarthy; Rhonda O'Keefe; Franc Llorens; Inga Zerr; Sabina Capellari; Piero Parchi; Stuart L Schreiber; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Efficient sample preparation in immuno-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using acoustic trapping.

Authors:  Björn Hammarström; Hong Yan; Johan Nilsson; Simon Ekström
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Antibody-independent targeted quantification of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein products in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jintang He; Xuefei Sun; Tujin Shi; Athena A Schepmoes; Thomas L Fillmore; Vladislav A Petyuk; Fang Xie; Rui Zhao; Marina A Gritsenko; Feng Yang; Naoki Kitabayashi; Sung-Suk Chae; Mark A Rubin; Javed Siddiqui; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Wei-Jun Qian; Richard D Smith; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Karin D Rodland; Tao Liu; David G Camp
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Targeted Mass Spectrometry Enables Multiplex, Quantitative Pharmacodynamic Studies of Phospho-Signaling.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; Ping Yan; Richard G Ivey; Uliana J Voytovich; Heather D Moore; Chenwei Lin; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Multiplexed Liquid Chromatography-Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Cancer Signaling Proteins.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Kate J Fisher; Mark Lloyd; Elizabeth R Wood; Domenico Coppola; Erin Siegel; David Shibata; Yian A Chen; John M Koomen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

8.  Microvesicle Proteomic Profiling of Uterine Liquid Biopsy for Ovarian Cancer Early Detection.

Authors:  Georgina D Barnabas; Keren Bahar-Shany; Stav Sapoznik; Limor Helpman; Yfat Kadan; Mario Beiner; Omer Weitzner; Nissim Arbib; Jacob Korach; Tamar Perri; Guy Katz; Anna Blecher; Benny Brandt; Eitan Friedman; David Stockheim; Ariella Jakobson-Setton; Ram Eitan; Shunit Armon; Hadar Brand; Oranit Zadok; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Michal Harel; Tamar Geiger; Keren Levanon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Mass spectrometry in cancer biomarker research: a case for immunodepletion of abundant blood-derived proteins from clinical tissue specimens.

Authors:  Darue A Prieto; Donald J Johann; Bih-Rong Wei; Xiaoying Ye; King C Chan; Dwight V Nissley; R Mark Simpson; Deborah E Citrin; Crystal L Mackall; W Marston Linehan; Josip Blonder
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.851

10.  Optimized Protocol for Quantitative Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Analysis of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  Jacob J Kennedy; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Regine M Schoenherr; Ping Yan; Kimberly Allison; Melissa Shipley; Melissa Lerch; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey Stuart Baird; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.