Literature DB >> 23548112

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas.

Ian J Laurenzi1, Gilbert R Jersey.   

Abstract

We present results of a life cycle assessment (LCA) of Marcellus shale gas used for power generation. The analysis employs the most extensive data set of any LCA of shale gas to date, encompassing data from actual gas production and power generation operations. Results indicate that a typical Marcellus gas life cycle yields 466 kg CO2eq/MWh (80% confidence interval: 450-567 kg CO2eq/MWh) of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 224 gal/MWh (80% CI: 185-305 gal/MWh) of freshwater consumption. Operations associated with hydraulic fracturing constitute only 1.2% of the life cycle GHG emissions, and 6.2% of the life cycle freshwater consumption. These results are influenced most strongly by the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of the well and the power plant efficiency: increase in either quantity will reduce both life cycle freshwater consumption and GHG emissions relative to power generated at the plant. We conclude by comparing the life cycle impacts of Marcellus gas and U.S. coal: The carbon footprint of Marcellus gas is 53% (80% CI: 44-61%) lower than coal, and its freshwater consumption is about 50% of coal. We conclude that substantial GHG reductions and freshwater savings may result from the replacement of coal-fired power generation with gas-fired power generation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23548112     DOI: 10.1021/es305162w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas.

Authors:  Haewon McJeon; Jae Edmonds; Nico Bauer; Leon Clarke; Brian Fisher; Brian P Flannery; Jérôme Hilaire; Volker Krey; Giacomo Marangoni; Raymond Mi; Keywan Riahi; Holger Rogner; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption associated with Bakken tight oil.

Authors:  Ian J Laurenzi; Joule A Bergerson; Kavan Motazedi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Life cycle water consumption and wastewater generation impacts of a Marcellus shale gas well.

Authors:  Mohan Jiang; Chris T Hendrickson; Jeanne M VanBriesen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Sustainable development index of shale gas exploitation in China, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  Liang Li; Fan Wu; Yuanyu Cao; Fei Cheng; Dali Wang; Huizhen Li; Zhiqiang Yu; Jing You
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-07-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.