Literature DB >> 24706166

The role of toxicological science in meeting the challenges and opportunities of hydraulic fracturing.

Bernard D Goldstein1, Bryan W Brooks, Steven D Cohen, Alexander E Gates, Michael E Honeycutt, John B Morris, Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, Trevor M Penning, John Snawder.   

Abstract

We briefly describe how toxicology can inform the discussion and debate of the merits of hydraulic fracturing by providing information on the potential toxicity of the chemical and physical agents associated with this process, individually and in combination. We consider upstream activities related to bringing chemical and physical agents to the site, on-site activities including drilling of wells and containment of agents injected into or produced from the well, and downstream activities including the flow/removal of hydrocarbon products and of produced water from the site. A broad variety of chemical and physical agents are involved. As the industry expands this has raised concern about the potential for toxicological effects on ecosystems, workers, and the general public. Response to these concerns requires a concerted and collaborative toxicological assessment. This assessment should take into account the different geology in areas newly subjected to hydraulic fracturing as well as evolving industrial practices that can alter the chemical and physical agents of toxicological interest. The potential for ecosystem or human exposure to mixtures of these agents presents a particular toxicological and public health challenge. These data are essential for developing a reliable assessment of the potential risks to the environment and to human health of the rapidly increasing use of hydraulic fracturing and deep underground horizontal drilling techniques for tightly bound shale gas and other fossil fuels. Input from toxicologists will be most effective when employed early in the process, before there are unwanted consequences to the environment and human health, or economic losses due to the need to abandon or rework costly initiatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benzene; hydraulic fracturing; methane; mixtures; radon; shale gas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24706166      PMCID: PMC4064016          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  28 in total

Review 1.  The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions.

Authors:  B D Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Prymnesium parvum: an emerging threat to inland waters.

Authors:  Bryan W Brooks; James P Grover; Daniel L Roelke
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework.

Authors:  M E Bette Meek; Alan R Boobis; Kevin M Crofton; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Marcel Van Raaij; Carolyn Vickers
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Carcinogenicity of diesel-engine and gasoline-engine exhausts and some nitroarenes.

Authors:  Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Robert A Baan; Yann Grosse; Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Neela Guha; Dana Loomis; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Public health and high volume hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Walter A Jones; Samantha L Malone; Leon F Vinci
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013

8.  Investigating links between shale gas development and health impacts through a community survey project in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nadia Steinzor; Wilma Subra; Lisa Sumi
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013

9.  Occupational exposures to respirable crystalline silica during hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Eric J Esswein; Michael Breitenstein; John Snawder; Max Kiefer; W Karl Sieber
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Missing from the table: role of the environmental public health community in governmental advisory commissions related to Marcellus Shale drilling.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein; Jill Kriesky; Barbara Pavliakova
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  13 in total

1.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Shale gas development in Canada: what are the potential health effects?

Authors:  Lalita Bharadwaj; Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Impact of natural gas extraction on PAH levels in ambient air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A decision analysis framework for estimating the potential hazards for drinking water resources of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.

Authors:  Erin E Yost; John Stanek; Lyle D Burgoon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The development and testing of a prototype mini-baghouse to control the release of respirable crystalline silica from sand movers.

Authors:  Barbara M Alexander; Eric J Esswein; Michael G Gressel; Jerry L Kratzer; H Amy Feng; Bradley King; Arthur L Miller; Emanuele Cauda
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust. I. Scope of the investigation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Fedan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Stream Vulnerability to Widespread and Emergent Stressors: A Focus on Unconventional Oil and Gas.

Authors:  Sally A Entrekin; Kelly O Maloney; Katherine E Kapo; Annika W Walters; Michelle A Evans-White; Kenneth M Klemow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Air concentrations of volatile compounds near oil and gas production: a community-based exploratory study.

Authors:  Gregg P Macey; Ruth Breech; Mark Chernaik; Caroline Cox; Denny Larson; Deb Thomas; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.