BACKGROUND: Technological advances (e.g. directional drilling, hydraulic fracturing), have led to increases in unconventional natural gas development (NGD), raising questions about health impacts. OBJECTIVES: We estimated health risks for exposures to air emissions from a NGD project in Garfield County, Colorado with the objective of supporting risk prevention recommendations in a health impact assessment (HIA). METHODS: We used EPA guidance to estimate chronic and subchronic non-cancer hazard indices and cancer risks from exposure to hydrocarbons for two populations: (1) residents living >½ mile from wells and (2) residents living ≤ ½ mile from wells. RESULTS: Residents living ≤ ½ mile from wells are at greater risk for health effects from NGD than are residents living >½ mile from wells. Subchronic exposures to air pollutants during well completion activities present the greatest potential for health effects. The subchronic non-cancer hazard index (HI) of 5 for residents ≤ ½ mile from wells was driven primarily by exposure to trimethylbenzenes, xylenes, and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Chronic HIs were 1 and 0.4. for residents ≤ ½ mile from wells and >½ mile from wells, respectively. Cumulative cancer risks were 10 in a million and 6 in a million for residents living ≤ ½ mile and >½ mile from wells, respectively, with benzene as the major contributor to the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment can be used in HIAs to direct health risk prevention strategies. Risk management approaches should focus on reducing exposures to emissions during well completions. These preliminary results indicate that health effects resulting from air emissions during unconventional NGD warrant further study. Prospective studies should focus on health effects associated with air pollution.
BACKGROUND: Technological advances (e.g. directional drilling, hydraulic fracturing), have led to increases in unconventional natural gas development (NGD), raising questions about health impacts. OBJECTIVES: We estimated health risks for exposures to air emissions from a NGD project in Garfield County, Colorado with the objective of supporting risk prevention recommendations in a health impact assessment (HIA). METHODS: We used EPA guidance to estimate chronic and subchronic non-cancer hazard indices and cancer risks from exposure to hydrocarbons for two populations: (1) residents living >½ mile from wells and (2) residents living ≤ ½ mile from wells. RESULTS: Residents living ≤ ½ mile from wells are at greater risk for health effects from NGD than are residents living >½ mile from wells. Subchronic exposures to air pollutants during well completion activities present the greatest potential for health effects. The subchronic non-cancer hazard index (HI) of 5 for residents ≤ ½ mile from wells was driven primarily by exposure to trimethylbenzenes, xylenes, and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Chronic HIs were 1 and 0.4. for residents ≤ ½ mile from wells and >½ mile from wells, respectively. Cumulative cancer risks were 10 in a million and 6 in a million for residents living ≤ ½ mile and >½ mile from wells, respectively, with benzene as the major contributor to the risk. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment can be used in HIAs to direct health risk prevention strategies. Risk management approaches should focus on reducing exposures to emissions during well completions. These preliminary results indicate that health effects resulting from air emissions during unconventional NGD warrant further study. Prospective studies should focus on health effects associated with air pollution.
Authors: Joan A Casey; David A Savitz; Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Jonathan Pollak; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019
Authors: Ryan J Bell; Nicholas G Davey; Morten Martinsen; Christian Collin-Hansen; Erik T Krogh; Christopher G Gill Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Roxana Z Witter; Lisa McKenzie; Kaylan E Stinson; Kenneth Scott; Lee S Newman; John Adgate Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Bernard D Goldstein; Bryan W Brooks; Steven D Cohen; Alexander E Gates; Michael E Honeycutt; John B Morris; Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta; Trevor M Penning; John Snawder Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 4.849