Literature DB >> 8776484

Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements.

G J Zelinsky1.   

Abstract

The degree of selectivity or guidance underlying search was tested by having subjects search for a target (a red vertical or green horizontal bar) among Similar (red horizontal and green vertical bars) and Dissimilar distractors (blue and yellow diagonal bars). If search is indeed a guided process, then the Dissimilar items should not be given the same scrutiny as elements sharing a feature with the target. The frequency of eye movements directed to the two distractor types was used as an indicator of this scrutiny. The analysis revealed almost equal percentages of saccades to Similar and Dissimilar elements (55% and 45%, respectively). Although indicating some evidence for selectivity during oculomotor search, this finding suggests that simpler and less optimal strategies may undermine the more efficient guided search algorithm.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8776484     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00300-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

Review 1.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-28

Review 6.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

7.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

8.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.

Authors:  Farhan Baluch; Farhan Baluchg; Laurent Itti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.