Literature DB >> 20884595

Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.

Antje Nuthmann1, John M Henderson.   

Abstract

Two contrasting views of visual attention in scenes are the visual salience and the cognitive relevance hypotheses. They fundamentally differ in their conceptualization of the visuospatial representation over which attention is directed. According to the saliency model, this representation is image-based, while the cognitive relevance framework advocates an object-based representation. Previous research has shown that (1) viewers prefer to look at objects over background and that (2) the saliency model predicts human fixation locations significantly better than chance. However, it could be that saliency mainly acts through objects. To test this hypothesis, we investigated where people fixate within real objects and saliency proto-objects. To this end, we recorded eye movements of human observers while they inspected photographs of natural scenes under different task instructions. We found a preferred viewing location (PVL) close to the center of objects within naturalistic scenes. Compared to the PVL for real objects, there was less evidence for a PVL for human fixations within saliency proto-objects. There was no evidence for a PVL when only saliency proto-objects that did not spatially overlap with annotated real objects were analyzed. The results suggest that saccade targeting and, by inference, attentional selection in scenes is object-based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884595     DOI: 10.1167/10.8.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  50 in total

1.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Frank Keller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-23

Review 4.  The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; James W Bisley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Where the action could be: Speakers look at graspable objects and meaningful scene regions when describing potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  What do saliency models predict?

Authors:  Kathryn Koehler; Fei Guo; Sheng Zhang; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Visual Functions of Primate Area V4.

Authors:  Anitha Pasupathy; Dina V Popovkina; Taekjun Kim
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.422

8.  Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A proto-object based saliency model in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Brian Hu; Ralinkae Kane-Jackson; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.