Literature DB >> 24009401

Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Stephanie A Borrie1, Megan J McAuliffe, Julie M Liss, Cecilia Kirk, Gregory A O'Beirne, Tim Anderson.   

Abstract

This investigation evaluated the familiarisation conditions required to promote subsequent and more long-term improvements in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech and examined the cognitive-perceptual processes that may underlie the experience-evoked learning response. Sixty listeners were randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups and were familiarised under the following conditions: (1) neurologically intact speech (control), (2) dysarthric speech (passive familiarisation), and (3) dysarthric speech coupled with written information (explicit familiarisation). All listeners completed an identical phrase transcription task immediately following familiarisation, and listeners familiarised with dysarthric speech also completed a follow-up phrase transcription task 7 days later. Listener transcripts were analysed for a measure of intelligibility (percent words correct), as well as error patterns at a segmental (percent syllable resemblance) and suprasegmental (lexical boundary errors) level of perceptual processing. The study found that intelligibility scores for listeners familiarised with dysarthric speech were significantly greater than those of the control group, with the greatest and most robust gains afforded by the explicit familiarisation condition. Relative perceptual gains in detecting phonetic and prosodic aspects of the signal varied dependent upon the familiarisation conditions, suggesting that passive familiarisation may recruit a different learning mechanism to that of a more explicit familiarisation experience involving supplementary written information. It appears that decisions regarding resource allocation during subsequent processing of dysarthric speech may be informed by the information afforded by the conditions of familiarisation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysarthria; Perceptual learning; Speech perception

Year:  2012        PMID: 24009401      PMCID: PMC3760733          DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.610596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  26 in total

1.  Adaptation to time-compressed speech: phonological determinants.

Authors:  N Sebastián-Gallés; E Dupoux; A Costa; J Mehler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-05

2.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Laurence White; James F Melhorn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

3.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

4.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  C Pallier; N Sebastian-Gallés; E Dupoux; A Christophe; J Mehler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

6.  Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.

Authors:  J M Liss; S M Spitzer; J N Caviness; C Adler; B W Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The intelligibility of synthesized speech: ECHO II versus VOTRAX.

Authors:  J Hoover; J Reichle; D Van Tasell; D Cole
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1987-09

8.  The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners.

Authors:  N S McGarr
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1983-09

9.  Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech.

Authors:  J M Liss; S Spitzer; J N Caviness; C Adler; B Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of semantic context and feedback on perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  17 in total

1.  Rhythm as a coordinating device: entrainment with disordered speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Effects of Familiarization on Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Stephani Luhrsen; Erin M Ingvalson; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Familiarization Effects on Consonant Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Heejin Kim
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  Autoscore: An open-source automated tool for scoring listener perception of speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Sarah E Yoho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Understanding dysrhythmic speech: When rhythm does not matter and learning does not happen.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Greg A O'Beirne; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  When Additional Training Isn't Enough: Further Evidence That Unpredictable Speech Inhibits Adaptation.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Cassidy Flechaus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Variability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Speech Intelligibility Scores in Children.

Authors:  Katherine C Hustad; Ashley Oakes; Kristen Allison
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Combining degradations: The effect of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Generalized Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.