Literature DB >> 6645470

The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners.

N S McGarr.   

Abstract

The study examines differences between experienced and inexperienced listeners in understanding the speech of the deaf. Listeners heard test words in three conditions: in sentences, as isolated words, and as segmented words (the later being words originally produced in sentences, excised, and then presented in isolation). Factors believed to account for listener differences were examined. These were relative word intelligibility, context, including the amount of linguistic information in a sentence, the overall length, and the position of the test word in the sentence. Scores for experienced listeners were consistently higher than those for inexperienced listeners across each factor considered. Differences between listeners were greatest for test words in sentences, followed by isolated and segmented test words. However, there was no statistically significant interaction between listener experience and any of the factors considered. Thus, the data do not support the hypotheses that have been proposed to account for listener differences. For both experienced and inexperienced listeners, scores varied systematically depending on the relative predicted intelligibility of the test words and the amount of context in the sentence.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6645470     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2603.451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  34 in total

1.  Imitation of nonwords by deaf children after cochlear implantation: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; Caitlin Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

2.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental analyses.

Authors:  Allyson K Carter; Caitlin M Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-05

4.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants: segmental analyses.

Authors:  Caitlin M Dillon; Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Allyson K Carter
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Epilogue: factors contributing to long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Michael J Strube; Emily A Tobey; David B Pisoni; Jean S Moog
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after more than 10 years of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Adrienne S Roman; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Allison L Sedey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Preschool speech intelligibility and vocabulary skills predict long-term speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation in early childhood.

Authors:  Irina Castellanos; William G Kronenberger; Jessica Beer; Shirley C Henning; Bethany G Colson; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-11-25

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.