Literature DB >> 9701975

Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: a cross-linguistic study.

C Pallier1, N Sebastian-Gallés, E Dupoux, A Christophe, J Mehler.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that, when hearers listen to artificially speeded speech, their performance improves over the course of 10-15 sentences, as if their perceptual system was "adapting" to these fast rates of speech. In this paper, we further investigate the mechanisms that are responsible for such effects. In Experiment 1, we report that, for bilingual speakers of Catalan and Spanish, exposure to compressed sentences in either language improves performance on sentences in the other language. Experiment 2 reports that Catalan/Spanish transfer of performance occurs even in monolingual speakers of Spanish who do not understand Catalan. In Experiment 3, we study another pair of languages--namely, English and French--and report no transfer of adaptation between these two languages for English-French bilinguals. Experiment 4, with monolingual English speakers, assesses transfer of adaptation from French, Dutch, and English toward English. Here we find that there is no adaptation from French and intermediate adaptation from Dutch. We discuss the locus of the adaptation to compressed speech and relate our findings to other cross-linguistic studies in speech perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9701975     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals.

Authors:  A Cutler; J Mehler; D Norris; J Segui
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: effects of talker and rate changes.

Authors:  E Dupoux; K Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech.

Authors:  E C Schwab; H C Nusbaum; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Word intelligibility decrements and the comprehension of time-compressed speech.

Authors:  G W Heiman; R J Leo; G Leighbody; K Bowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

5.  Variable speech control vs Varispeech: does newer mean better?

Authors:  J F Schmitt; S W Moore; N J Lass
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1986-07

Review 6.  Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech.

Authors:  E Foulke; T G Sticht
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The relationship of estimated comprehensibility to the rate of connected speech.

Authors:  H J de Haan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-07

8.  A language-specific comprehension strategy.

Authors:  A Cutler; J Mehler; D Norris; J Segui
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Jul 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

2.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Cecilia Kirk; Gregory A O'Beirne; Tim Anderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Familiarization Effects on Consonant Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Heejin Kim
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Jeremy L Loebach; Lawrence Phillips; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Melissa Baese-Berk; Rachel E Baker; Arim Choi; Midam Kim; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 7.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Adaptive plasticity in speech perception: Effects of external information and internal predictions.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Generalized Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: Adapting to time-compressed speech.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.