Literature DB >> 10875386

Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.

J M Liss1, S M Spitzer, J N Caviness, C Adler, B W Edwards.   

Abstract

This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners' use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875386     DOI: 10.1121/1.429412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Discriminating dysarthria type from envelope modulation spectra.

Authors:  Julie M Liss; Sue LeGendre; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss; Cecilia Kirk; Gregory A O'Beirne; Tim Anderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  Effects of Familiarization on Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Stephani Luhrsen; Erin M Ingvalson; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  The Effects of Topic Knowledge on Intelligibility and Lexical Segmentation in Hypokinetic and Ataxic Dysarthria.

Authors:  Rene L Utianski; Kaitlin L Lansford; Julie M Liss; Tamiko Azuma
Journal:  J Med Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-12-01

5.  Amplitude fluctuations in a masker influence lexical segmentation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Bomjun J Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Autoscore: An open-source automated tool for scoring listener perception of speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Sarah E Yoho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of stress and word size in Spanish speech segmentation.

Authors:  Amy LaCross; Julie Liss; Beatriz Barragan; Ashley Adams; Visar Berisha; Megan McAuliffe; Robert Fromont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A Cross-Language Study of Acoustic Predictors of Speech Intelligibility in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Yunjung Kim; Yaelin Choi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Objective Intelligibility Assessment by Automated Segmental and Suprasegmental Listening Error Analysis.

Authors:  Yishan Jiao; Amy LaCross; Visar Berisha; Julie Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Quantifying speech rhythm abnormalities in the dysarthrias.

Authors:  Julie M Liss; Laurence White; Sven L Mattys; Kaitlin Lansford; Andrew J Lotto; Stephanie M Spitzer; John N Caviness
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.